Re: The word TYPE in search contexts and fields
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 16463
interpreted = N
texte = Yes, it is smart enough to distingush between eqshiptypedata= and shiptype= (that is, a field named shiptype and ship). The problem is probably something more subtle. What sort of a search are you doing, what is being returned, and what do you expect? John.>I have several (well, two) fields in my main database called TYPE and>SHIPTYPE. Recently I've been noticing some errors cropping up when I use>these fields in search arguements (or replace, etc.)>>I think it's causing conflict with the FIELDtype= arguement.>Is WebCat smart enough to parse the part of eqSHIPTYPEdatarq so that it>realizes that I don't have a field called EQSHIP and it's of some type?>>This is causing a few problems, and I'd like to fix it as soon as I can.>Finding and replacing field names would be *very* cumbersome.>>Michael>>Michael Winston *By Phone!: (503)/652/8815 x341>Internet Coordinator *By e-mail!: michaelw@dhorse.com>Dark Horse Comics, Inc. *By web!: http://www.dhorse.com/ John A. Hill, V.P. Marketing Pacific Coast SoftwareeCommerce / Web Developer Tools http://www.smithmicro.com
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Yes, it is smart enough to distingush between eqshiptypedata= and shiptype= (that is, a field named shiptype and ship). The problem is probably something more subtle. What sort of a search are you doing, what is being returned, and what do you expect? John.>I have several (well, two) fields in my main database called TYPE and>SHIPTYPE. Recently I've been noticing some errors cropping up when I use>these fields in search arguements (or replace, etc.)>>I think it's causing conflict with the FIELDtype= arguement.>Is WebCat smart enough to parse the part of eqSHIPTYPEdatarq so that it>realizes that I don't have a field called EQSHIP and it's of some type?>>This is causing a few problems, and I'd like to fix it as soon as I can.>Finding and replacing field names would be *very* cumbersome.>>Michael>>Michael Winston *By Phone!: (503)/652/8815 x341>Internet Coordinator *By e-mail!: michaelw@dhorse.com>Dark Horse Comics, Inc. *By web!: http://www.dhorse.com/ John A. Hill, V.P. Marketing Pacific Coast SoftwareeCommerce / Web Developer Tools http://www.smithmicro.com
John Hill
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Date calculation problems (1997)
case sensitivity in lookups (1997)
NT 4.0/IIS WebCat Installation (1998)
Ok here is a question? (1997)
[SHOWIF]s and empty arguments (1997)
SSL with IIS 4.0 (1998)
question about checkboxes (1999)
Limitations on fields? Server is crashing (1997)
SV: WebCat on Linux (2000)
raw field names (2001)
multiple databases (1997)
Using Cookie for client specific info? (1997)
WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997)
The code, one more time. (2003)
Maybe off topic but how to charge (1997)
hidden databases (2000)
[WebDNA] Weird issue with ADD (2018)
[shipCost] math formula? (1997)
preference to using Apache 2.x or 1.3.x with WebDNA 6.0? (2004)
Calculating days, hours, minutes ago (2004)