Re: followup to ws3 vs ws2.1 speed

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 16776
interpreted = N
texte = At 8:45 PM -0800 3/26/98, Dale LaFountain wrote: >As you can see, WS 2.1 is still faster than 3.0 here, but the margin is >much closer now. Removing Webcatalog from the equation had a HUGE effect >on performance (much more than I expected), and this page only contained >minimal date math and a couple lookups. I ran a few other tests with >various files and the results looked similar, so I won't bore you with >those details.One thing to consider is that several of the Plug-Ins included with WebSTAR 3.0 run in the W*API's Filter role. Thus every request is sent through those Plug-Ins. If you are not using the Filter Plug-Ins you may want to remove them as they will give you a slight speed increase. If I recall correctly, all of the following WebSTAR 3.0 Plug-Ins run in the role of a Filter; WebSTAR Byte Server, WebSTAR Directory Indexer, WebSTAR Java Servlet Runner, WebSTAR WebObjects Adaptor.I hope this helps.================================================================ Eric Zelenka mailto:eric@smithmicro.com WebSTAR Product Manager http://www.smithmicro.com/ StarNine Inc. http://eric.smithmicro.com/ The Future Is In Beta Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: followup to ws3 vs ws2.1 speed (Grant Hulbert 1998)
  2. Re: followup to ws3 vs ws2.1 speed (Eric Zelenka 1998)
  3. followup to ws3 vs ws2.1 speed (Dale LaFountain 1998)
At 8:45 PM -0800 3/26/98, Dale LaFountain wrote: >As you can see, WS 2.1 is still faster than 3.0 here, but the margin is >much closer now. Removing Webcatalog from the equation had a HUGE effect >on performance (much more than I expected), and this page only contained >minimal date math and a couple lookups. I ran a few other tests with >various files and the results looked similar, so I won't bore you with >those details.One thing to consider is that several of the Plug-Ins included with WebSTAR 3.0 run in the W*API's Filter role. Thus every request is sent through those Plug-Ins. If you are not using the Filter Plug-Ins you may want to remove them as they will give you a slight speed increase. If I recall correctly, all of the following WebSTAR 3.0 Plug-Ins run in the role of a Filter; WebSTAR Byte Server, WebSTAR Directory Indexer, WebSTAR Java Servlet Runner, WebSTAR WebObjects Adaptor.I hope this helps.================================================================ Eric Zelenka mailto:eric@smithmicro.com WebSTAR Product Manager http://www.smithmicro.com/ StarNine Inc. http://eric.smithmicro.com/ The Future Is In Beta Eric Zelenka

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

PCS Emailer's role ? (1997) 2 easy questions re: [showif] and [sendmail] (1997) FTP and [shell] (2003) Date and Time Math (1997) Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997) Snippet to calculate local time (2003) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) WebCat2b12 CGI Mac -- Problems propagating the cart through (1997) Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997) two unique banners on one page (1997) Shownext - am i missing something? (1998) Re:Emailer and encryption (1997) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) Sending E-mail (1997) Grant, please help me ... (1997) founditems (1998) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997) Outlook Rule (2002) No subject given (2000) stumped (2001)