Re: followup to ws3 vs ws2.1 speed

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 16776
interpreted = N
texte = At 8:45 PM -0800 3/26/98, Dale LaFountain wrote: >As you can see, WS 2.1 is still faster than 3.0 here, but the margin is >much closer now. Removing Webcatalog from the equation had a HUGE effect >on performance (much more than I expected), and this page only contained >minimal date math and a couple lookups. I ran a few other tests with >various files and the results looked similar, so I won't bore you with >those details.One thing to consider is that several of the Plug-Ins included with WebSTAR 3.0 run in the W*API's Filter role. Thus every request is sent through those Plug-Ins. If you are not using the Filter Plug-Ins you may want to remove them as they will give you a slight speed increase. If I recall correctly, all of the following WebSTAR 3.0 Plug-Ins run in the role of a Filter; WebSTAR Byte Server, WebSTAR Directory Indexer, WebSTAR Java Servlet Runner, WebSTAR WebObjects Adaptor.I hope this helps.================================================================ Eric Zelenka mailto:eric@smithmicro.com WebSTAR Product Manager http://www.smithmicro.com/ StarNine Inc. http://eric.smithmicro.com/ The Future Is In Beta Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: followup to ws3 vs ws2.1 speed (Grant Hulbert 1998)
  2. Re: followup to ws3 vs ws2.1 speed (Eric Zelenka 1998)
  3. followup to ws3 vs ws2.1 speed (Dale LaFountain 1998)
At 8:45 PM -0800 3/26/98, Dale LaFountain wrote: >As you can see, WS 2.1 is still faster than 3.0 here, but the margin is >much closer now. Removing Webcatalog from the equation had a HUGE effect >on performance (much more than I expected), and this page only contained >minimal date math and a couple lookups. I ran a few other tests with >various files and the results looked similar, so I won't bore you with >those details.One thing to consider is that several of the Plug-Ins included with WebSTAR 3.0 run in the W*API's Filter role. Thus every request is sent through those Plug-Ins. If you are not using the Filter Plug-Ins you may want to remove them as they will give you a slight speed increase. If I recall correctly, all of the following WebSTAR 3.0 Plug-Ins run in the role of a Filter; WebSTAR Byte Server, WebSTAR Directory Indexer, WebSTAR Java Servlet Runner, WebSTAR WebObjects Adaptor.I hope this helps.================================================================ Eric Zelenka mailto:eric@smithmicro.com WebSTAR Product Manager http://www.smithmicro.com/ StarNine Inc. http://eric.smithmicro.com/ The Future Is In Beta Eric Zelenka

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Can't find templaes (1997) More on the email templates (1997) Does TCPconnect/TCPsend do multiples? (2000) Alternating colors (1997) carriage returns in data (1997) format and math on the fly (1998) WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997) all records returned. (1997) Shopping Cart Best Practices (2006) Cumulative Shipping charge calculations - your help please. (1997) vs (1997) Shell on MacOSX (2004) Separate SSL Server (1997) WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997) FREE Web Server Monitor FREE (1997) Moment of Thanks (1997) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) SSL and WebCatalog (1997) PCS Customer submissions ? (1997) [SHOWIF] (1997)