Re: [date] problem with %d%m%Y

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 18296
interpreted = N
texte = Laurent:I'll take a look at it and let you know what I find. It should definitely work as you expect.John.>I have noticed a bug in the [date] tag when performing math calculation>on a date when the date prefs is non standard.>>If the date preference is set to default : %m%d%Y (such as 12/25/1997)> [math date]{[date]}+90[/math] adds 90 days to the current date>>If the date preference is set to : %d%m%Y (such as 25/12/1997)> [math date]{[date]}+90[/math] DOES NOT add 90 days to the current>date>>What should I do ? In France we are used to %d%m%Y and nobody understands>a date when the month is given first (05/06/98 is the 5 june 1998 for us,>not 6 may 1998).>>I have also noticed problems when adding 12 monthes to a date with the>result.>I have included my date-test-code so you can see what happens with the>preferences of Webcatalog set to %m%d%Y or %d%m%Y. The expected result>only happens with %m%d%Y>>Laurent.>>---Sample code follows ----->date : [date]

>date + 2 monthes : [math date]{[date]}+{00/2/0000}[/math]

>date + 2 days : [math date]{[date]}+{2/00/0000}[/math]

>date + 2 years : [math date]{[date]}+{00/00/0002}[/math]

>date + 30 days : [math date]{[date]}+30[/math]

>date + 60 days : [math date]{[date]}+60[/math]

>date + 90 days : [math date]{[date]}+90[/math]

>date + 365 days : [math date]{[date]}+365[/math]

>date + 730 days : [math date]{[date]}+730[/math]

>french format :
>date + 3 monthes : [math date]{[date]}+{00/03/0000}[/math]

>date + 6 monthes : [math date]{[date]}+{00/06/0000}[/math]

>date + 12 monthes : [math date]{[date]}+{00/12/0000}[/math]

>--
>US format
>date + 3 monthes : [math date]{[date]}+{03/00/0000}[/math]

>date + 6 monthes : [math date]{[date]}+{06/00/0000}[/math]

>date + 12 monthes : [math date]{[date]}+{12/00/0000}[/math]

>>>--->Laurent Pladys>LXir>> L a u r e n t P l a d y s>---------------------------------------------> L X i r>_____________________________________________> 1 5 5 r u e d e P i c p u s> 7 5 0 1 2 P a r i s> F r a n c e>_____________________________________________> +33 (0)1 44 68 80 60 (tel)> +33 (0)1 44 68 80 61 (fax)>_____________________________________________> w w w . L X i r . n e t> l t p l a d y s @ L X i r . n e t John A. Hill, V.P. Marketing Pacific Coast SoftwareeCommerce / Web Developer Tools http://www.smithmicro.com Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: [date] problem with %d%m%Y (John Hill 1998)
[date] problem with %d%m%Y (Laurent Pladys 1998)
Re: [date] problem with %d%m%Y (John Hill 1998)
Re: [date] problem with %d%m%Y (John Hill 1998)

Laurent:I'll take a look at it and let you know what I find. It should definitely work as you expect.John.>I have noticed a bug in the [date] tag when performing math calculation>on a date when the date prefs is non standard.>>If the date preference is set to default : %m%d%Y (such as 12/25/1997)> [math date]{[date]}+90[/math] adds 90 days to the current date>>If the date preference is set to : %d%m%Y (such as 25/12/1997)> [math date]{[date]}+90[/math] DOES NOT add 90 days to the current>date>>What should I do ? In France we are used to %d%m%Y and nobody understands>a date when the month is given first (05/06/98 is the 5 june 1998 for us,>not 6 may 1998).>>I have also noticed problems when adding 12 monthes to a date with the>result.>I have included my date-test-code so you can see what happens with the>preferences of Webcatalog set to %m%d%Y or %d%m%Y. The expected result>only happens with %m%d%Y>>Laurent.>>---Sample code follows ----->date : [date]