Re: 3.0 [TEXT] variables

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 20503
interpreted = N
texte = At 1:57 PM -0800 10/15/98, Dave MacLeay is rumored to have typed: > The ability to use [text] to alter the values stored in form variables > would have many potential applications, as does your idea for assigning new > cart numbers. The potential for advanced forms-validation alone makes my > head spin: form input could be cleaned up once, at the top of a template, > eliminating the need to do all sorts of multiple data checks that currently > litter many a template.Yes! I was planning on doing exactly this. I would have cut at least two of my templates in half. I would have listed this as one of the biggest, best additional tools added in WC3. It would have been useful on so many levels (imagineI was so convinced things were going to work this way that I never even bothered to check for it before the final release. Dave is right, the potential uses do make the head spin.MichaelMichael Winston *By e-mail!: michaelw@dhorse.com Senior Web Developer *By web!: http://www.dhorse.com/ Dark Horse Comics, Inc. *By fax!: 503/654/9440 Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: 3.0 [TEXT] variables (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  2. Re: 3.0 [TEXT] variables (Grant Hulbert 1998)
  3. Re: 3.0 [TEXT] variables (Christer Olsson 1998)
  4. Re: 3.0 [TEXT] variables (Michael Winston 1998)
  5. Re: 3.0 [TEXT] variables (Grant Hulbert 1998)
  6. Re: 3.0 [TEXT] variables (Rob Marquardt 1998)
  7. Re: 3.0 [TEXT] variables (Dave MacLeay 1998)
  8. 3.0 [TEXT] variables (Michael Winston 1998)
At 1:57 PM -0800 10/15/98, Dave MacLeay is rumored to have typed: > The ability to use [text] to alter the values stored in form variables > would have many potential applications, as does your idea for assigning new > cart numbers. The potential for advanced forms-validation alone makes my > head spin: form input could be cleaned up once, at the top of a template, > eliminating the need to do all sorts of multiple data checks that currently > litter many a template.Yes! I was planning on doing exactly this. I would have cut at least two of my templates in half. I would have listed this as one of the biggest, best additional tools added in WC3. It would have been useful on so many levels (imagineI was so convinced things were going to work this way that I never even bothered to check for it before the final release. Dave is right, the potential uses do make the head spin.MichaelMichael Winston *By e-mail!: michaelw@dhorse.com Senior Web Developer *By web!: http://www.dhorse.com/ Dark Horse Comics, Inc. *By fax!: 503/654/9440 Michael Winston

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

webdelivery not working (1998) [WebDNA] find missing file in [listfiles] (2019) Forcing a NEWCART (1997) .XLS file problems (2008) 3.08 has trouble keeping the serial # ?? (2000) [WebDNA] current thinking on architecture of mass email scripts? (2011) Upgrading old WebCat Database Files (1997) carriage returns in data (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997) Banners (1997) covertchars db to keep CR's, but not new ones (2002) RE: WebCat name recognition (was MacFinder -- a new WebDNAweb site) (1998) [Sum] function? (1997) search form problem.. (1997) Search returns all, not 20 (1997) Number searching/formats (1998) Math (1997) [Summary] re: Emailer setup (1997) Multiple email troubles (2001) creator code (1997)