Re: Suffix or Line?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1999
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 23127
interpreted = N
texte = At 13:57 Uhr -0800 30.01.1999, PCS Technical Support wrote:>>If a plugin like WebCat is involved, it has to do something and I expect >>the whole operation to be slower.... > >Yes, but remember the one important thing: you've instructed the web server >to send all .tpl files thru WebCatalog. >..
.. >If you really want the pages to >only go thru the squid cache, then don't suffix-map them to WebCatalog!I know. Please note that I talk about fine-tuning and (second) want to collect some knowledge about overall-performance on a machine which serves a fast increasing number of WebCat-driven sites. Let me ask in a different way: If a .tpl page does not require WebDNA, then removing the HAS_DNA.. line gives less work for WebCat, must be faster. Suffix mapping to WebCat is still active - but has this any impact on performance in the combination WebTen/WebCat? Theoretically it must have, but is this true in real life?During development we cannot tell which pages finally require WebDNA. So we usually give all the appropriate suffix and the HAS_WEBDNA_TAGS-line by default. Once finished, I think it is a good idea to do some cleanup to avoid useless overload of WebCat. We plan to add a second Mac server soon, so I would be happy to get suggestions or ideas how to organize the WebTen/WebCat-playground properly. >Also, do some timing tests before you assume that there's something wrong >with our caching mechanism.I've never assumed that. Peter++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Peter Ostry - Vienna/Austria - www.ostry.com Fon ++43-1-877 74 54 Fax ++43-1-877 74 54-21 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
At 13:57 Uhr -0800 30.01.1999, PCS Technical Support wrote:>>If a plugin like WebCat is involved, it has to do something and I expect >>the whole operation to be slower.... > >Yes, but remember the one important thing: you've instructed the web server >to send all .tpl files thru WebCatalog. >.... >If you really want the pages to >only go thru the squid cache, then don't suffix-map them to WebCatalog!I know. Please note that I talk about fine-tuning and (second) want to collect some knowledge about overall-performance on a machine which serves a fast increasing number of WebCat-driven sites. Let me ask in a different way: If a .tpl page does not require WebDNA, then removing the HAS_DNA.. line gives less work for WebCat, must be faster. Suffix mapping to WebCat is still active - but has this any impact on performance in the combination WebTen/WebCat? Theoretically it must have, but is this true in real life?During development we cannot tell which pages finally require WebDNA. So we usually give all the appropriate suffix and the HAS_WEBDNA_TAGS-line by default. Once finished, I think it is a good idea to do some cleanup to avoid useless overload of WebCat. We plan to add a second Mac server soon, so I would be happy to get suggestions or ideas how to organize the WebTen/WebCat-playground properly. >Also, do some timing tests before you assume that there's something wrong >with our caching mechanism.I've never assumed that. Peter++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Peter Ostry - Vienna/Austria - www.ostry.com Fon ++43-1-877 74 54 Fax ++43-1-877 74 54-21 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Peter Ostry
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[OT] CSS and SSI books (2004)
RE: OK, here goes... (1997)
Snake Bites (1997)
test for John (1999)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - more [date] problems (1997)
WebDNA Codes in Secure Mode (1997)
Problems with [Applescript] (1997)
Re:Remote stockroom ? (1998)
RE: [WebDNA] Installing WebDNA on Windows 7 64 Bit, Home Premium (2010)
formula?? (2000)
off topic fetch vs PCS photomaster (1997)
search engine friendly URLS (Mac) and Lycos! (1998)
test sorry (2001)
Include (1998)
Error: Can't open order file. (2005)
Hello world ... (2002)
Odd Cart Behavior (1997)
Unix Timestamp using WebDNA [code req] (2003)
RE: protect tag on NT (1997)
PCS Frames (1997)