Re: textarea input truncated at 255 chars

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1999


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 24156
interpreted = N
texte = I always mean to give the whole story Ken. In that state of not knowing a solution, then I obviously do not know what is the whole story. I mean what if my page is 50k of code? Everytime I have a problem that is probably some tiny mistake I should post the whole template? - or worse yet - multiple templates when I don't even know which one causes the problem? Most would find that annoying and not read it wouldn't they. I was warm all over from embarrassment that it was such a simpe thing that was actually a documented feature of webcat... I just didn't remember it from over a year ago when I read that part of the docs. Seems like, as always, it is a question of balance. We all try. Thanks for your help. :-)-JohnKenneth Grome wrote:> I'm glad you feel warn all over, but next time will you please give us the WHOLE STORY from the beginning, including posting your actual webdna code in your FIRST request for help? Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: textarea input truncated at 255 chars (John Butler 1999)
  2. Re: textarea input truncated at 255 chars (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  3. Re: textarea input truncated at 255 chars (John Butler 1999)
I always mean to give the whole story Ken. In that state of not knowing a solution, then I obviously do not know what is the whole story. I mean what if my page is 50k of code? Everytime I have a problem that is probably some tiny mistake I should post the whole template? - or worse yet - multiple templates when I don't even know which one causes the problem? Most would find that annoying and not read it wouldn't they. I was warm all over from embarrassment that it was such a simpe thing that was actually a documented feature of webcat... I just didn't remember it from over a year ago when I read that part of the docs. Seems like, as always, it is a question of balance. We all try. Thanks for your help. :-)-JohnKenneth Grome wrote:> I'm glad you feel warn all over, but next time will you please give us the WHOLE STORY from the beginning, including posting your actual webdna code in your FIRST request for help? Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to John Butler

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Size issues (2001) I give up!! (1997) Emailer (WebCat2) (1997) Snake Bites (1997) Bug? (1997) unsubscribe (1997) emailer settings and control questions (1997) Detecting/limiting connections in the developer edition ... (2004) WebMerchant 3.0 for Mac shipping now (1998) default value from Lookup (was Grant, please help me) (1997) Mozilla/4. and Browser Info.txt (1997) Almost a there but..bye bye NetCloak (1997) [AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997) U&P IIS concept (1998) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) webten vs. webstar (1998) Am I going senile? (Price recalc based on quantity) (1997) Online reference (1997) [Replace] (2000) Requiring that certain fields be completed (1997)