Re: Browser Resolution
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1999
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 25011
interpreted = N
texte = > The slightly longer answer is that it is none of your> business. HTML is supposed to be resolution agnostic; I almost didn't reply to this, but I just couldn't take it. As technology changes and it becomes possible to determine more and moreinformation about our viewers, not only is it NOT wrong to customizeinterfaces to their environment, but it is a responsible thing to do foryour clients for which you might develop. Without making this a personal flame, I would say that I whole-heartedlydisagree. Developers that use technology to it's fullest to further improvethe online experience for visitors may ultimately be far more successfulthan those who simply say HTML wasn't designed to do thatAnd in an attempt to make this email something besides a Me Too or NotMe, I have noticed that many browser versions of Explorer for windows havepassed screen resolution information in the header. That could also havesome effect when using mime info from webcat.Hope this helpsAlex--Alex J. McCombie (800-724-8973) http://OurClients.com Corporate http://McCombie.com Personal (Alex@McCombie.com) http://ClubGab.com/ <--- Now here's a serious Chat Room! --->-------------------------------------------------------------Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server.To end your Mail problems go to
.This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
> The slightly longer answer is that it is none of your> business. HTML is supposed to be resolution agnostic; I almost didn't reply to this, but I just couldn't take it. As technology changes and it becomes possible to determine more and moreinformation about our viewers, not only is it NOT wrong to customizeinterfaces to their environment, but it is a responsible thing to do foryour clients for which you might develop. Without making this a personal flame, I would say that I whole-heartedlydisagree. Developers that use technology to it's fullest to further improvethe online experience for visitors may ultimately be far more successfulthan those who simply say HTML wasn't designed to do thatAnd in an attempt to make this email something besides a Me Too or NotMe, I have noticed that many browser versions of Explorer for windows havepassed screen resolution information in the header. That could also havesome effect when using mime info from webcat.Hope this helpsAlex--Alex J. McCombie (800-724-8973) http://OurClients.com Corporate http://McCombie.com Personal (Alex@McCombie.com) http://ClubGab.com/ <--- Now here's a serious Chat Room! --->-------------------------------------------------------------Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server.To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Alex McCombie
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Been meaning to ask... (1997)
WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997)
Multiple cart additions (1997)
Req: Array Tags Explained, simple and clear (2003)
[ShowCart]-- was ThankYou page problems (1997)
Claris HomePage messes up the code (1997)
Redirect in 4.0 (2000)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
[quantity] within formulas (1997)
Bug or syntax error on my part? (1997)
triggers.db (1999)
SHOWIF/HIDEIF empty fields (2005)
can WC render sites out? (1997)
Wrapping text (1998)
Emailer (1997)
About WebDNA (2006)
Showif, Hideif reverse logic ? (1997)
Blog/social networking shortcut (2007)
Multiple Ad databases? (1997)
[url] link (1998)