Re: Browser Resolution

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1999


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 25011
interpreted = N
texte = > The slightly longer answer is that it is none of your > business. HTML is supposed to be resolution agnostic; I almost didn't reply to this, but I just couldn't take it. As technology changes and it becomes possible to determine more and more information about our viewers, not only is it NOT wrong to customize interfaces to their environment, but it is a responsible thing to do for your clients for which you might develop. Without making this a personal flame, I would say that I whole-heartedly disagree. Developers that use technology to it's fullest to further improve the online experience for visitors may ultimately be far more successful than those who simply say HTML wasn't designed to do thatAnd in an attempt to make this email something besides a Me Too or Not Me, I have noticed that many browser versions of Explorer for windows have passed screen resolution information in the header. That could also have some effect when using mime info from webcat.Hope this helps Alex -- Alex J. McCombie (800-724-8973) http://OurClients.com Corporate http://McCombie.com Personal (Alex@McCombie.com) http://ClubGab.com/ <--- Now here's a serious Chat Room! ---> ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Browser Resolution (Alex McCombie 1999)
  2. Re: Browser Resolution (test test test) (Brad Eisenberg 1999)
  3. Re: Browser Resolution (Brad Eisenberg 1999)
  4. Re: Browser Resolution (jpeacock@univpress.com 1999)
> The slightly longer answer is that it is none of your > business. HTML is supposed to be resolution agnostic; I almost didn't reply to this, but I just couldn't take it. As technology changes and it becomes possible to determine more and more information about our viewers, not only is it NOT wrong to customize interfaces to their environment, but it is a responsible thing to do for your clients for which you might develop. Without making this a personal flame, I would say that I whole-heartedly disagree. Developers that use technology to it's fullest to further improve the online experience for visitors may ultimately be far more successful than those who simply say HTML wasn't designed to do thatAnd in an attempt to make this email something besides a Me Too or Not Me, I have noticed that many browser versions of Explorer for windows have passed screen resolution information in the header. That could also have some effect when using mime info from webcat.Hope this helps Alex -- Alex J. McCombie (800-724-8973) http://OurClients.com Corporate http://McCombie.com Personal (Alex@McCombie.com) http://ClubGab.com/ <--- Now here's a serious Chat Room! ---> ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Alex McCombie

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Been meaning to ask... (1997) WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997) Multiple cart additions (1997) Req: Array Tags Explained, simple and clear (2003) [ShowCart]-- was ThankYou page problems (1997) Claris HomePage messes up the code (1997) Redirect in 4.0 (2000) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) [quantity] within formulas (1997) Bug or syntax error on my part? (1997) triggers.db (1999) SHOWIF/HIDEIF empty fields (2005) can WC render sites out? (1997) Wrapping text (1998) Emailer (1997) About WebDNA (2006) Showif, Hideif reverse logic ? (1997) Blog/social networking shortcut (2007) Multiple Ad databases? (1997) [url] link (1998)