Suggestion to expand [convertchars] ...
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 26044
interpreted = N
texte = If convertchars were improved like this:[convertchars db=some.db&fromField=fieldName1&toField=fieldName2]... we could use a *single database* for ALL our convertchars needs! This would give us the ability to use any two fields in a single database for our 'from' and 'to' fields -- simply by identifying those fields in the [convertchars] tag.Then, instead of having to use literally dozens of special database files, one for every unique character conversion we need to perform, we could store all our conversion values and tables in a single database file for greater efficiency.What's more, this feature would still allow the implementation of my previous suggestion to make the [convertchars] context more friendly by giving it the ability to perform a single-character or a single-word conversion on the fly -- WITHOUT USING A DATABASE -- like this:[convertchars fromValue=value1&toValue=value2]================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499, http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to
.This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
| |
- Suggestion to expand [convertchars] ... (Kenneth Grome 2000)
|
If convertchars were improved like this:[convertchars db=some.db&fromField=fieldName1&toField=fieldName2]... we could use a *single database* for ALL our convertchars needs! This would give us the ability to use any two fields in a single database for our 'from' and 'to' fields -- simply by identifying those fields in the [convertchars] tag.Then, instead of having to use literally dozens of special database files, one for every unique character conversion we need to perform, we could store all our conversion values and tables in a single database file for greater efficiency.What's more, this feature would still allow the implementation of my previous suggestion to make the [convertchars] context more friendly by giving it the ability to perform a single-character or a single-word conversion on the fly -- WITHOUT USING A DATABASE -- like this:[convertchars fromValue=value1&toValue=value2]================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499, http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Unexpected comparison behavior change in 4.5.1 (2003)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
Extended [ConvertChars] (1997)
Problems getting parameters passed into email. (1997)
Bug? (1997)
carriage returns in data (1997)
unable to launch acgi in WebCat (1997)
Nesting Search Within ![]()
Tag? (1997)
date sorting and 'template (1997)
GuestBook example (1997)
Simple Store (2000)
[WebDNA] Test (2008)
WebCat for mass emailings (1997)
Still More on EudoraPro Email (1998)
Cookies-last one (1999)
Most Recent version of WebDNA For RH ES (2006)
How Many SKU's is enough? (1997)
setting taxable to true (1997)
inetinfo.exe (1999)
Hidden or Forbidden? (1998)