Re: Summary Searches

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 27130
interpreted = N
texte = At 10:52 PM -0800 2000/02/06, WebDNA Support wrote:> >I am confused about summary searches. I created one and it worked, >>but I did not get what I expected. I just got one record per unique >>summary field. >> >>I expected that, but I also wanted a count of the records in that >>summary (and what about totaling fields). >> >>Is there some trick I missed in the doc that allows this? -Chuck- > >No, that's how it works. In order to get more information about the >smaller list of records which have been 'compressed' into the >summary, you would need to nest a second search inside the >[FoundItems] which found just those records. An example is in your >docs, and for your convenience can also be found at >http://www.smithmicro.com/webcatreference/SearchMultipleDatabases.h >tmlThanks. I think that I know what I need to do, but it sounds rather inefficient. It would be a nice enhancement to allow a [summNumFound] tag inside the [founditems] context. -Chuck- __________________________________________________________________________ Chuck Rice ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Summary Searches (WebDNA Support 2000)
  2. Re: Summary Searches (Chuck Rice 2000)
  3. Re: Summary Searches (WebDNA Support 2000)
  4. Summary Searches (Chuck Rice 2000)
At 10:52 PM -0800 2000/02/06, WebDNA Support wrote:> >I am confused about summary searches. I created one and it worked, >>but I did not get what I expected. I just got one record per unique >>summary field. >> >>I expected that, but I also wanted a count of the records in that >>summary (and what about totaling fields). >> >>Is there some trick I missed in the doc that allows this? -Chuck- > >No, that's how it works. In order to get more information about the >smaller list of records which have been 'compressed' into the >summary, you would need to nest a second search inside the >[founditems] which found just those records. An example is in your >docs, and for your convenience can also be found at >http://www.smithmicro.com/webcatreference/SearchMultipleDatabases.h >tmlThanks. I think that I know what I need to do, but it sounds rather inefficient. It would be a nice enhancement to allow a [summNumFound] tag inside the [founditems] context. -Chuck- __________________________________________________________________________ Chuck Rice ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Chuck Rice

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Header values are not accepted (1998) Undeliverable Mail (1997) [OT] Dedicated Image Uploader/Server [/OT] (2003) TRAINING videos - Prove IT. (1998) math with multiple [founditems] (1999) Orders.db problem (2003) PCS Frames (1997) W3c Validation (2004) WebTen Memory Error with Plug-In (1998) Bug Report, maybe (1997) 2.0 Info (1997) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) SiteGuard Use Question (1997) who are you people (1998) Week # problem (1998) [WebDNA] test (2011) authenticating a second user, the sequel (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA Roll Call (2013) Basics of tcpconnect (2006) File commands and Wild Cards ?? (1998)