Re: Summary Searches
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 27130
interpreted = N
texte = At 10:52 PM -0800 2000/02/06, WebDNA Support wrote:> >I am confused about summary searches. I created one and it worked,>>but I did not get what I expected. I just got one record per unique>>summary field.>>>>I expected that, but I also wanted a count of the records in that>>summary (and what about totaling fields).>>>>Is there some trick I missed in the doc that allows this? -Chuck->>No, that's how it works. In order to get more information about the>smaller list of records which have been 'compressed' into the>summary, you would need to nest a second search inside the>[FoundItems] which found just those records. An example is in your>docs, and for your convenience can also be found at>http://www.smithmicro.com/webcatreference/SearchMultipleDatabases.h>tmlThanks. I think that I know what I need to do, but it sounds rather inefficient. It would be a nice enhancement to allow a [summNumFound] tag inside the [founditems] context. -Chuck-__________________________________________________________________________Chuck Rice
-------------------------------------------------------------Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server.To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
At 10:52 PM -0800 2000/02/06, WebDNA Support wrote:> >I am confused about summary searches. I created one and it worked,>>but I did not get what I expected. I just got one record per unique>>summary field.>>>>I expected that, but I also wanted a count of the records in that>>summary (and what about totaling fields).>>>>Is there some trick I missed in the doc that allows this? -Chuck->>No, that's how it works. In order to get more information about the>smaller list of records which have been 'compressed' into the>summary, you would need to nest a second search inside the>[founditems] which found just those records. An example is in your>docs, and for your convenience can also be found at>http://www.smithmicro.com/webcatreference/SearchMultipleDatabases.h>tmlThanks. I think that I know what I need to do, but it sounds rather inefficient. It would be a nice enhancement to allow a [summNumFound] tag inside the [founditems] context. -Chuck-__________________________________________________________________________Chuck Rice -------------------------------------------------------------Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server.To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Chuck Rice
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Header values are not accepted (1998)
Undeliverable Mail (1997)
[OT] Dedicated Image Uploader/Server [/OT] (2003)
TRAINING videos - Prove IT. (1998)
math with multiple [founditems] (1999)
Orders.db problem (2003)
PCS Frames (1997)
W3c Validation (2004)
WebTen Memory Error with Plug-In (1998)
Bug Report, maybe (1997)
2.0 Info (1997)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
SiteGuard Use Question (1997)
who are you people (1998)
Week # problem (1998)
[WebDNA] test (2011)
authenticating a second user, the sequel (1997)
[WebDNA] WebDNA Roll Call (2013)
Basics of tcpconnect (2006)
File commands and Wild Cards ?? (1998)