Re: [OT] .php3 extension

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 27629
interpreted = N
texte = >>I've been asked to redevelop a site that uses PHP and as there is not too >>much done using this software will probably adapt it to WebCat. > >So it is the majority opinion here that WebCat is a weaker tool than PHP? >I thought PHP was a pretty strong language, at least in the open source >community that is touting it..PHP is more difficult and more time-consuming for most people to learn and to use on a daily basis. Nevertheless, it is actually a lot better for some tasks, while webcat is better for others ...================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re[2]: [OT] .php3 extension (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  2. Re: [OT] .php3 extension (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  3. Re: [OT] .php3 extension (Christopher Feyrer 2000)
  4. Re: [OT] .php3 extension (Stuart Tremain 2000)
  5. Re: [OT] .php3 extension (Stuart Tremain 2000)
  6. Re: [OT] .php3 extension (Christopher Feyrer 2000)
  7. Re: [OT] .php3 extension (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  8. [OT] .php3 extension (Stuart Tremain 2000)
>>I've been asked to redevelop a site that uses PHP and as there is not too >>much done using this software will probably adapt it to WebCat. > >So it is the majority opinion here that WebCat is a weaker tool than PHP? >I thought PHP was a pretty strong language, at least in the open source >community that is touting it..PHP is more difficult and more time-consuming for most people to learn and to use on a daily basis. Nevertheless, it is actually a lot better for some tasks, while webcat is better for others ...================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997) WebCat2b12 CGI Mac -- Problems propagating the cart through (1997) Summing fields (1997) New NT betas available (1997) Reversed words (1997) method of payment (1997) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) Re[2]: 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) Aaron kant add (or whatever it was) (2000) signup bots (2006) Re:Emailer tracking (1997) Uploading files with 3.0/4.0 (2000) WebCat & WebTen (1997) Denying access by IP address (2000) Bug in WebCat, (2000) How far do [showif]s go? (1997) SiteGaurd file Cache vs webcatalog cache (1997) WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997) error: Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997)