Re: OR-searching
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 27726
interpreted = N
texte = on 17.02.2000 22:11, Peter Ostry at po@ostry.com wrote: > That does it: > [search db=group.db&woGROUP_IDdata=1&woGROUP_IDdata=2&GROUP_IDword=ww] > finds exactly the values I specify.on 17.02.2000 22:15, Kenneth Grome at ken@simplewebstores.com wrote: > it is NOT ALLOWED to search on a 'database' field with more than one > parameter! If you need to search the same database field with more than one > parameter, you MUST use the group field technique, Ken,my search works now, using a couple of woFIELDdata on the same field - and setting FIELDword=ww. Do you mean that I am just lucky or this is probably a bug which turns out as a feature?I have already a theory: WebCat searches all fields which partly contain my values (wo). Afterwards it applies (ww) and reduces the result - only ecact values will remain. Is this theory childish and should I switch to your suggested method of assigning the same field to a couple of groups? Peter ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to
.This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
on 17.02.2000 22:11, Peter Ostry at po@ostry.com wrote: > That does it: > [search db=group.db&woGROUP_IDdata=1&woGROUP_IDdata=2&GROUP_IDword=ww] > finds exactly the values I specify.on 17.02.2000 22:15, Kenneth Grome at ken@simplewebstores.com wrote: > it is NOT ALLOWED to search on a 'database' field with more than one > parameter! If you need to search the same database field with more than one > parameter, you MUST use the group field technique, Ken,my search works now, using a couple of woFIELDdata on the same field - and setting FIELDword=ww. Do you mean that I am just lucky or this is probably a bug which turns out as a feature?I have already a theory: WebCat searches all fields which partly contain my values (wo). Afterwards it applies (ww) and reduces the result - only ecact values will remain. Is this theory childish and should I switch to your suggested method of assigning the same field to a couple of groups? Peter ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Peter Ostry
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
NEW 4.X BUG?!?!?!? - WAS: The force has left me. (2002)
blank page from template (1997)
Weird Math and SV Bad News (1997)
WebDNA and SQL (2003)
WebObjects (2000)
NT vs Mac (1997)
access denied problem (1997)
Shownext problems (1999)
WC Database Format (1997)
WebDNA dying and trashing my databases - still crashing (2005)
[shownext] and descending order (1997)
Where's Cart Created ? (1997)
the dreaded unitShipCost (2003)
typhoon vs. webcatalog (1997)
Not really WebCat (1997)
WebCatalog keeps quiting on Solaris, and support isn't su (2000)
referrer variable (1997)
Encryption (2000)
For those of you not on the WebCatalog Beta... (1997)
GuestBook example (1997)