Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 29484
interpreted = N
texte = on 3/22/00 2:22 PM, jpeacock@univpress.com at jpeacock@univpress.com wrote:> No, no, NO, NO NOOOOOOOO!!!! > > There is no reason to change the obvious > to .gt. or even ). Follow the HTML > standards: > > 3> > > The addition of the quotes allows any parser to distinguish between greater > than > and the closing >. This not something new to learn; you don't like it, stick > with [showif]. This enhancement is intended to make it easier for visual HTML > editors to manage with WebDNA. > > John Peacock > > > ____________________Reply Separator____________________ > Subject: Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 > Author: > Date: 3/22/00 10:05 AM > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This works well for most contexts, but there are a few exceptions >>> that can confuse most parsers. Specifically, ShowIf can contain >>> characters like > which look just like HTML to a parser: >>> >>> 3> >>> ^ looks a lot like followed by a 3 >> >> Shouldn't the parser leave stuff between alone until >> webcat has substituted HTML the parser can deal with? > > > Yes but you're missing the point. Grant is concerned about the > character > being > used inside the TAG, not inside the CONTEXT. Look, this illustrates the use of > > > inside the tag: > > 3> > ... stuff here ... > > > The problem here is that webcat will think that the tag is > instead of 3>. So the solution is to make webcat understand > that > the first > character in this tag is a comparison operator and that it does > NOT > mark the end of the tag. And that would be a hassle to code, thus the reason > for > my simple solution ... > > Just use a different comparison operator! > > Obviously if webcat's language recognized some character OTHER THAN > to mean > greater than, this would not even be an issue. > > It's a lot better to use a different character for the greater than operator > than to develop a bunch of new syntax for us to have to learn, that's why I > suggested using ) or } instead of > as the greater than comparison operator. > Then the webdna language would understand that ) or } means greater than, > and > this would be a non-issue. > > The solution would then be to use the same syntax we have always used, with > the > simple substitution of ONE CHARACTER, like this: > > > ... stuff here ... > > > ... or like this: > > > ... stuff here ... > > > ================================ > Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant > 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net > ================================ > > > > > > > ############################################################# > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > > Send administrative queries to > ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Will Starck 2000)
  2. Re[2]: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  3. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Pat McCormick 2000)
  4. Re: Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (Pat McCormick 2000)
  5. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  6. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  7. Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0 (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
on 3/22/00 2:22 PM, jpeacock@univpress.com at jpeacock@univpress.com wrote:> No, no, NO, NO NOOOOOOOO!!!! > > There is no reason to change the obvious > to .gt. or even ). Follow the HTML > standards: > > 3> > > The addition of the quotes allows any parser to distinguish between greater > than > and the closing >. This not something new to learn; you don't like it, stick > with [showif]. This enhancement is intended to make it easier for visual HTML > editors to manage with WebDNA. > > John Peacock > > > ____________________Reply Separator____________________ > Subject: Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 > Author: > Date: 3/22/00 10:05 AM > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This works well for most contexts, but there are a few exceptions >>> that can confuse most parsers. Specifically, ShowIf can contain >>> characters like > which look just like HTML to a parser: >>> >>> 3> >>> ^ looks a lot like followed by a 3 >> >> Shouldn't the parser leave stuff between alone until >> webcat has substituted HTML the parser can deal with? > > > Yes but you're missing the point. Grant is concerned about the > character > being > used inside the TAG, not inside the CONTEXT. Look, this illustrates the use of > > > inside the tag: > > 3> > ... stuff here ... > > > The problem here is that webcat will think that the tag is > instead of 3>. So the solution is to make webcat understand > that > the first > character in this tag is a comparison operator and that it does > NOT > mark the end of the tag. And that would be a hassle to code, thus the reason > for > my simple solution ... > > Just use a different comparison operator! > > Obviously if webcat's language recognized some character OTHER THAN > to mean > greater than, this would not even be an issue. > > It's a lot better to use a different character for the greater than operator > than to develop a bunch of new syntax for us to have to learn, that's why I > suggested using ) or } instead of > as the greater than comparison operator. > Then the webdna language would understand that ) or } means greater than, > and > this would be a non-issue. > > The solution would then be to use the same syntax we have always used, with > the > simple substitution of ONE CHARACTER, like this: > > > ... stuff here ... > > > ... or like this: > > > ... stuff here ... > > > ================================ > Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant > 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net > ================================ > > > > > > > ############################################################# > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > > Send administrative queries to > ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Pat McCormick

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[Sum] function? (1997) Integration with SQL (1997) Changing user submitted data (2000) showif with math? (2000) WebDNA Quick Reference (Reserved Words) (2000) sorting and grouping (1998) WCS Newbie question (1997) select multiple (1997) Windows 2.1b2 Append Bug? (1997) SKU (1997) ooops...WebCatalog [FoundItems] Problem - LONG - (1997) Listserver problem (1997) F3 crashing server (1997) WC1.6 to WC2 date formatting (1997) method of payment (1997) Sending emails (went[ot] ) (2002) Help name our technology! (1997) Non-Cart Files in Shopping Cart Folder (1997) Memory Error message (1998) Nested tags count question (1997)