Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 30361
interpreted = N
texte = I'll be out of town 'till after tax day, (It's really that bad ) so bear with me - there is no one but Door Prize (the cat) to handle your e-mail, and I really don't quite trust him at he moment.Thanx Have a good Day, (unless you have made other arrangements)Regards - Johnny>From: JoeDan@West21.com (Joseph D'Andrea) >Sender: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com >Reply-to: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com >To: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com >At 8:51 AM 4/12/00, Nicolas Verhaeghe wrote: >>Where can we find a list of ALL the new features? > >Yeah... please check with the legal department... and tell us as many >of the new features as possible. > >I'm particularly interested in a feature that was proposed and agreed >to by someone at the then PCS where the number of records for each >found item in a summary search will be available. > >For example, right now if you do a search on a db and use a summary, >[numfound] equals the total number of unique values in that field. >But in order to find out how many records have that unique value you >have to do another search for each value. > >[search db=some.db&eqFIELDdata=_all_&asFIELDsort=1&FIELDsumm=t] >There are [numfound] unique values in the FIELD field
>[founditems] > [search db=some.db&eqFIELDdata=[FIELD]] > [numfound] equal [FIELD]
> [/search] >[/founditems] >[/search] > >I'd love to be able to eliminate that inner search like this: > >[search db=some.db&eqFIELDdata=_all_&asFIELDsort=1&FIELDsumm=t] >There are [numfound] unique values in the FIELD field
>[founditems] > [summfound] equal [FIELD]
>[/founditems] >[/search] > >___Joe___ > >_________________________________________________ >Joseph D'Andrea JoeDan@West21.com >WEST21.com Internet services for the 21st Century > http://www.west21.com/ >_________________________________________________ > > >############################################################# >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > >To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > >Send administrative queries to > > > >----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- >Return-Path: >Received: from rly-yc04.mx.aol.com (rly-yc04.mail.aol.com >[172.18.149.36]) by air-yc02.mail.aol.com (v70.20) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Apr >2000 12:15:18 >Received: from smithmicro.com (post.smithmicro.com [207.67.226.13]) >by rly-yc04.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:14:30 >X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 3.1 >List-Unsubscribe: >List-Archive: >>Message-ID: >Reply-To: >Sender: >To: >Precedence: list >X-Original-Message-Id: >Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:11:14 >From: Joseph D'Andrea >Subject: Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? > Regards - Johnny ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (JSWilliams@aol.com 2000)
  2. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (JSWilliams@aol.com 2000)
  3. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (JSWilliams@aol.com 2000)
  4. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (JSWilliams@aol.com 2000)
  5. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (JSWilliams@aol.com 2000)
  6. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (JSWilliams@aol.com 2000)
  7. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  8. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  9. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (Joseph D'Andrea 2000)
  10. Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
I'll be out of town 'till after tax day, (It's really that bad ) so bear with me - there is no one but Door Prize (the cat) to handle your e-mail, and I really don't quite trust him at he moment.Thanx Have a good Day, (unless you have made other arrangements)Regards - Johnny>From: JoeDan@West21.com (Joseph D'Andrea) >Sender: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com >Reply-to: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com >To: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com >At 8:51 AM 4/12/00, Nicolas Verhaeghe wrote: >>Where can we find a list of ALL the new features? > >Yeah... please check with the legal department... and tell us as many >of the new features as possible. > >I'm particularly interested in a feature that was proposed and agreed >to by someone at the then PCS where the number of records for each >found item in a summary search will be available. > >For example, right now if you do a search on a db and use a summary, >[numfound] equals the total number of unique values in that field. >But in order to find out how many records have that unique value you >have to do another search for each value. > >[search db=some.db&eqFIELDdata=_all_&asFIELDsort=1&FIELDsumm=t] >There are [numfound] unique values in the FIELD field
>[founditems] > [search db=some.db&eqFIELDdata=[FIELD]] > [numfound] equal [FIELD]
> [/search] >[/founditems] >[/search] > >I'd love to be able to eliminate that inner search like this: > >[search db=some.db&eqFIELDdata=_all_&asFIELDsort=1&FIELDsumm=t] >There are [numfound] unique values in the FIELD field
>[founditems] > [summfound] equal [FIELD]
>[/founditems] >[/search] > >___Joe___ > >_________________________________________________ >Joseph D'Andrea JoeDan@West21.com >WEST21.com Internet services for the 21st Century > http://www.west21.com/ >_________________________________________________ > > >############################################################# >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > >To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > >Send administrative queries to > > > >----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- >Return-Path: >Received: from rly-yc04.mx.aol.com (rly-yc04.mail.aol.com >[172.18.149.36]) by air-yc02.mail.aol.com (v70.20) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Apr >2000 12:15:18 >Received: from smithmicro.com (post.smithmicro.com [207.67.226.13]) >by rly-yc04.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:14:30 >X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 3.1 >List-Unsubscribe: >List-Archive: >>Message-ID: >Reply-To: >Sender: >To: >Precedence: list >X-Original-Message-Id: >Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:11:14 >From: Joseph D'Andrea >Subject: Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? > Regards - Johnny ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to JSWilliams@aol.com

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Search problem C++ (2000) checksum for credit cards? (1997) Re:redirect from the errorsMessages.db entry (1997) What am I missing (1997) PCS Frames (1997) [SHOWIF] (1997) Decrypting a user password (2000) Using Plug-In while running 1.6.1 (1997) Re WebDNA has reached it connection limit (2004) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) Dumb Question about Docs (1997) [WebDNA] Feature Request: [returnhtml] (2016) stopping/restarting service on NT? (1998) [WebDNA] improvements (2015) Re[2]: Search Engines (2000) WCS Newbie question (1997) WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997) Separate SSL Server (1997) Thanks Grant (1997) [WebDNA] Small Parsing Problem (2009)