Re: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 31211
interpreted = N
texte = > My suggestion this morning for compatibility () is a > reasonable accomodation for those people who do not want to redo the _logic_ > of > their templates. It's not redoing the logic, it's about redoing the whole stuff!!!Like a form template which uses an include for the form itself, a section where it detects errors, and show the same include again if there is a mistake.And many other things like that.The question is: do we want to get rid of this great feature???The answer is: NO.############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re[3]: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  2. Re[2]: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  3. Re[2]: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  4. Re: Re[2]: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (Jesse Proudman 2000)
  5. Re: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (Mike Davis 2000)
  6. Re: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (Jesse Proudman 2000)
  7. Re: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  8. Re: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (Jesse Proudman 2000)
  9. Re: Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  10. Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
> My suggestion this morning for compatibility () is a > reasonable accomodation for those people who do not want to redo the _logic_ > of > their templates. It's not redoing the logic, it's about redoing the whole stuff!!!Like a form template which uses an include for the form itself, a section where it detects errors, and show the same include again if there is a mistake.And many other things like that.The question is: do we want to get rid of this great feature???The answer is: NO.############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Nicolas Verhaeghe

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

primer/tutorial question (2004) WebDNA 4.5 & iTools 7 (2003) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) I'm tired of all this! (2000) Show if time tags (1997) E-Mail (1998) Re:no [search] with NT (1997) AuthorizeNet Declines (2005) [lookup] vs. [search] (1998) 2.0 Info (1997) Quit revisited (1997) PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997) Emailer Set Up (1997) (1998) Databases (2000) How do you cause a new window to appear behind the current window? (1999) help needed: Non-english characters in WebCatalog (1997) Counter for SKUs viewed (2002) WebCatalog dying in NT (1998) Can't load tmpl files (1997)