Re: Public beta 2 for WebCatalog 4.0 is now available.
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 31529
interpreted = N
texte = >We are still evaluating the correct solution to provide the best >security and the easiest transition for everyone, but we are not >going back to the old style - the security hole is too large... Do you mean that in version 4 there's not even going to be an option, such as secure=f or something similar, that we can use on a case-by-case basis to allow continuing use of the variable hierarchy webcat introduced in 1996?Or do you mean you are honestly going to add an *option* to version 4 that allows continuing use of the former variable hierarchy in one way or another, such that it will still be possible for some math and text variables to be overridden by incoming formvariables -- but that you just haven't decided how to implement it yet?Or do you mean something else entirely? ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>We are still evaluating the correct solution to provide the best >security and the easiest transition for everyone, but we are not >going back to the old style - the security hole is too large... Do you mean that in version 4 there's not even going to be an option, such as secure=f or something similar, that we can use on a case-by-case basis to allow continuing use of the variable hierarchy webcat introduced in 1996?Or do you mean you are honestly going to add an *option* to version 4 that allows continuing use of the former variable hierarchy in one way or another, such that it will still be possible for some math and text variables to be overridden by incoming formvariables -- but that you just haven't decided how to implement it yet?Or do you mean something else entirely? ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
ListFields and [name] (1997)
Auto Wrap Text in (2004)
Passing variables to Realm Authentication - WebStar (1998)
Which GUI HTML editors work with WC ? (1997)
Suggestions (1998)
more on prefs not being written (2000)
ReturnRaw context (1997)
Weird Math and SV (1997)
Deleting associated records from 2 different databases (2001)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
Cookie set browser session. (1998)
HTML E-mails demystified (2002)
OT: creating html emails on a mac (2003)
WebCat 5 Intranet Question (2003)
Database Options (1997)
WebCat for mass emailings (1997)
Time Tracking (2003)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
XML version of WebDNA docs? (2000)
Slightly OT: Regex and Date Modified/Created (2002)