Re: Public beta 6 for WebCatalog 4.0 is now available
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 32724
interpreted = N
texte = >I just checked and the [capitalize] context is still too sensitive to>the apostrophe embedded in the string. For example:[EXAMPLE DELETED]>If the>parser performed a lookahead and only capitalized after an apostrophe>when the second character after is a letter, not whitespace.What about word's like they're and I'll or if a multiple possession ends a sentence (giving you ...the three boys'. New sentence.)? Ideally, there would be a built in list of words that are parsed properly, but I imagine that the internal code to account for that would be a far cry from what it is now.But I agree, there should be some extra parsing. Maybe options added to the [CAPITALIZE] tag ([CAPITALIZE posessive=t&contractions=t]). I don't know exactly how the options would work, but possessive could just ignore any apostrophes with an s after it, contractions would look for 'll, etc. It's not a perfect scheme because it ignore words like don't and can't, but it's a start.Michael#############################################################This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>I just checked and the [capitalize] context is still too sensitive to>the apostrophe embedded in the string. For example:[EXAMPLE DELETED]>If the>parser performed a lookahead and only capitalized after an apostrophe>when the second character after is a letter, not whitespace.What about word's like they're and I'll or if a multiple possession ends a sentence (giving you ...the three boys'. New sentence.)? Ideally, there would be a built in list of words that are parsed properly, but I imagine that the internal code to account for that would be a far cry from what it is now.But I agree, there should be some extra parsing. Maybe options added to the [capitalize] tag ([CAPITALIZE posessive=t&contractions=t]). I don't know exactly how the options would work, but possessive could just ignore any apostrophes with an s after it, contractions would look for 'll, etc. It's not a perfect scheme because it ignore words like don't and can't, but it's a start.Michael#############################################################This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Michael Winston
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
more trouble with [showif] in [search] = busted [shownext] - SOLVED (2000)
Break out of a loop? (2000)
[LOOKUP] (1997)
quotes and truncating? (1997)
Math Problem - Format? (1997)
Extracting undeliverable email addresses (2003)
[WebDNA] [OT] WSC WebSites downtime (2013)
Different coloured rows for [FoundItems] (2000)
Storebuilder Problems...Looking for last minute heroic (2004)
[Replace] (2000)
Banner Ads (2000)
$Quit, $CloseDatabase corrections (1997)
Sku numbers (1997)
Message Boards (2003)
WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997)
PCS Emailer's role ? (1997)
WebCatalog dying in WebTen (1998)
Hello??? (1997)
Umm...about those log files? (Off Topic) (1997)