Re: Payment calculator ??
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 34332
interpreted = N
texte = >> >I tried: >> > >> >[math]principle * (monthly interest)/(1-(1+monthly >> >interest)**-(length*12)))[/math] >> >> It would probably work if you used the proper syntax. Things like >> principle and monthly interest and length mean nothing in the >> webdna language ... > >I don't want to take this to a sarcastic direction, but don't you think it >would be common sense not to use actual words in webcat in a [math] formula?No, for many beginners it is NOT common sense ...You are certainly not the first person to post something like that on this list. Those who have posted similar 'code' in the past actually thought it was valid code. I have no evidence that you know any better, so for all I know you are a beginner who knows virtually nothing about the webdna language and has posted his actual webdna code.If you're going to post something that looks like it could be a beginner's attempt at writing webdna code (but is not) then I think you should make it clear that you are posting pseudo-code and not real code. ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>> >I tried: >> > >> >[math]principle * (monthly interest)/(1-(1+monthly >> >interest)**-(length*12)))[/math] >> >> It would probably work if you used the proper syntax. Things like >> principle and monthly interest and length mean nothing in the >> webdna language ... > >I don't want to take this to a sarcastic direction, but don't you think it >would be common sense not to use actual words in webcat in a [math] formula?No, for many beginners it is NOT common sense ...You are certainly not the first person to post something like that on this list. Those who have posted similar 'code' in the past actually thought it was valid code. I have no evidence that you know any better, so for all I know you are a beginner who knows virtually nothing about the webdna language and has posted his actual webdna code.If you're going to post something that looks like it could be a beginner's attempt at writing webdna code (but is not) then I think you should make it clear that you are posting pseudo-code and not real code. ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
2.1b2 was SLOW ... but 2.1b3 is FAST! (1997)
Calculating multiple shipping... (1997)
Nested tags count question (1997)
using webdna to determine pixel parameters (2000)
Purchased cart being overwritten (1997)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
Fwd: FW: Purchase Command error (1997)
PIXO (1997)
Sorta OT: Printing From Browser Window (2001)
Reversing [ipaddress] normalization (1998)
Encrypt question. (2000)
Problems w/ heavy use of cart header fields? (1998)
StoreBuilder ADD 2 CART redirects to default.tpl - PLEASESTOP THIS! (2002)
Size limit for tmpl editor ? (1997)
emailer w/F2 (1997)
Revisit: speed test (2002)
I'm tired of all this! (2000)
4.5 Upgrade (2003)
Now you see it now you donīt (1997)
Sku numbers (1997)