Re: Size issues

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2001


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 37269
interpreted = N
texte = Some thoughts, (I'm working from memory here so I might not be 100%)I believe file size could be affected with how your hard drive was originally formatted on your server. In order for it to show actual file size it should have been formatted as Mac OS Extended. I believe OS 8.6 also fixed some issues regarding file size.As far as server crashes. We used to run Webstar 4.x on a G3 with WebCat 4.x. We usually could go about six months without a crash. The one time we did experience chronic crashes it turned out to be poorly written WebDNA in our site. We forgot to include a [URL] context in our form and everytime someone submitted that page it would bring down the server. After we fixed that problem the server ran indefinitely. I would check your code.Just some thoughts.-- Robert Kudrle Coil, Counts, Ford & Cheney rjk27@ccfc.comOn Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:24 AM, Alisha Outridge wrote: >I checked it out. It still says 65k but on all the database (it affects >files also) I download and check on my work machine I see that they weigh >their actual size (8k for instance) but still say 65k on the >web server. > >This would just be a minor viewer annoyance if it weren't for the fact that >my big databases seem like they are actually being condensed to >65k. > >P.S. Server also crashes approximately every 20 minutes for >some reason. > >Alisha Outridge >Spec Simple, Inc >Where the World of Design Connects... > >> From: Paolo Coppo >> Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk) >> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 18:05:43 >> To: (WebCatalog Talk) >> Subject: Re: OT?: Size issues >> >>> Every day for the past two days I have noticed that my server's size field >>> in finder is saying that everything weighs 65k. Even HTML pages but more >>> importantly databases. It is also very strange because some databases aren't >>> affected so it looks like it could be affecting only the active databases... >>> very confusing. Also the big databases (possibly the ones whoa re more than >>> 65k?) are getting junked up by the fieldnames being deleted and the top few >>> hundred records being deleted. >>> >>> Anyone experiencing any of these happenings and have some advice? >>> >>> Alisha Outridge >> >> select a file and the do command-i (get info); >> the *real* file size is the one inside (); the other size is the hd >> space this file uses (depends on how you format a drive) >> >> hth >> >> blo >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >> >> Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ >------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Size issues (Robert Kudrle 2001)
  2. Re: Size issues (Christer Olsson 2001)
  3. Re: Size issues (Donovan Brooke 2001)
  4. Re: Size issues (Donovan Brooke 2001)
  5. Re: Size issues (Clayton Randall 2001)
  6. Re: OT?: Size issues (Glenn Busbin 2001)
  7. Re: OT?: Size issues (Alisha Outridge 2001)
  8. Re: OT?: Size issues (Paolo Coppo 2001)
  9. Re: Size issues (Jason Halla 2001)
  10. OT?: Size issues (Alisha Outridge 2001)
  11. Re: Size issues (Jason Halla 2001)
Some thoughts, (I'm working from memory here so I might not be 100%)I believe file size could be affected with how your hard drive was originally formatted on your server. In order for it to show actual file size it should have been formatted as Mac OS Extended. I believe OS 8.6 also fixed some issues regarding file size.As far as server crashes. We used to run Webstar 4.x on a G3 with WebCat 4.x. We usually could go about six months without a crash. The one time we did experience chronic crashes it turned out to be poorly written WebDNA in our site. We forgot to include a [url] context in our form and everytime someone submitted that page it would bring down the server. After we fixed that problem the server ran indefinitely. I would check your code.Just some thoughts.-- Robert Kudrle Coil, Counts, Ford & Cheney rjk27@ccfc.comOn Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:24 AM, Alisha Outridge wrote: >I checked it out. It still says 65k but on all the database (it affects >files also) I download and check on my work machine I see that they weigh >their actual size (8k for instance) but still say 65k on the >web server. > >This would just be a minor viewer annoyance if it weren't for the fact that >my big databases seem like they are actually being condensed to >65k. > >P.S. Server also crashes approximately every 20 minutes for >some reason. > >Alisha Outridge >Spec Simple, Inc >Where the World of Design Connects... > >> From: Paolo Coppo >> Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk) >> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 18:05:43 >> To: (WebCatalog Talk) >> Subject: Re: OT?: Size issues >> >>> Every day for the past two days I have noticed that my server's size field >>> in finder is saying that everything weighs 65k. Even HTML pages but more >>> importantly databases. It is also very strange because some databases aren't >>> affected so it looks like it could be affecting only the active databases... >>> very confusing. Also the big databases (possibly the ones whoa re more than >>> 65k?) are getting junked up by the fieldnames being deleted and the top few >>> hundred records being deleted. >>> >>> Anyone experiencing any of these happenings and have some advice? >>> >>> Alisha Outridge >> >> select a file and the do command-i (get info); >> the *real* file size is the one inside (); the other size is the hd >> space this file uses (depends on how you format a drive) >> >> hth >> >> blo >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >> >> Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ >------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Robert Kudrle

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Bug Report, maybe (1997) Running webdna on centos 4.2? (2006) WebCat2b15MacPlugIn - [authenticate] not [protect] (1997) Date Calulation (1997) Initiating NewCart (1997) Setting up WebCatalog with Retail Pro data (1996) Shared Webstar Directory (1998) Limit on nested [ShowIf]'s? (1997) autosensing lanague selection (1997) Problem (1997) Re(2): SSL, WebSTAR, WebCatalog (1998) autosensing lanague selection (1997) [Webcat 2]Next (1997) CERT Advisory on malicious scripts (2000) pc (1997) Here we go again... (2006) The List is Changing (1997) TCPConnect , can I get an example, pretty please. (2002) Multiple Pulldowns (1997) W* V4.2 SSL and webcat very slow (2000)