Re: Tax Moratorium Expiring
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2001
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 39504
interpreted = N
texte = Glenn Busbin wrote:> > Despite predictions to the contrary, the wonderful folks in the US Congress failed to pass an extension to the moratorium on sales taxes for ecommerce.
> > It looks like we're going to have to use a sales tax rate for each of the hundreds of tax districts in the US and probably can't determine which to use without cross referencing that with a customer's zip code.> > How are you guys handling this?> IANAL (but I play one on TV ;~) http://www.antionline.com/jargon/IANAL.phpThere are two U.S. Supreme Court cases dealing with interstate commercewhich pretty much rule this arena (though they are old enough to not directly cover Internet commerce). They basically boil down to the following: 1. Interstate commerce is regulated at the federal level 2. States have a legitimate right to collect taxes on sales made to companies with a significant presence in that state 3. States can legally charge a use-tax on consumers for sales made to out of state companies 4. Congress can permit States to force out of state vendors to remit sales tax for in state customersHowever, since Congress has NOT done #4, and pretty much all states HAVE done #3, unless you have a significant presence in a state, thestate has no way to force you to remit sales tax for any transactionsdealing with citizens of their state. And only sales to customers instates where you have a presence are currently covered by sales tax.What the definition of significant presence is requires a lawyer.If you have a web server in TX and offices in LA, do you need to paytaxes? I don't know; I don't know that anyone does. If it is a co-location arrangement or a managed server (i.e. do you own the server) can make a difference.We have a warehouse in PA, our home office is in MD, and we havesatellite offices in CO, CA, IL, TN, NY. We charge sales tax in those seven states for all of our mail or phone orders (which includes any sales made on our web sites). If you want to be completely covered, have a page suggesting that anycustomer purchasing something from your site may owe a use tax to their state of residence. I am not currently worrying about this (I am just outside the DC beltway; I have other worries). Expect one ormore state to go after someone very big (Amazon comes to mind ;~) andtest the water. It is unlikely to affect anyone smaller for some years to come.The only thing that will happen immediately (IMHO) is that states willtry to start taxing Internet accounts. This is a completely seperateissue from the e-commerce aspect. See the third section titles NetTax Confusion of the above link for more details.My 2 centsJohn-- John PeacockDirector of Information Research and TechnologyRowman & Littlefield Publishing Group4720 Boston WayLanham, MD 20706301-459-3366 x.5010fax 301-429-5747-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Glenn Busbin wrote:> > Despite predictions to the contrary, the wonderful folks in the US Congress failed to pass an extension to the moratorium on sales taxes for ecommerce. > > It looks like we're going to have to use a sales tax rate for each of the hundreds of tax districts in the US and probably can't determine which to use without cross referencing that with a customer's zip code.> > How are you guys handling this?> IANAL (but I play one on TV ;~) http://www.antionline.com/jargon/IANAL.phpThere are two U.S. Supreme Court cases dealing with interstate commercewhich pretty much rule this arena (though they are old enough to not directly cover Internet commerce). They basically boil down to the following: 1. Interstate commerce is regulated at the federal level 2. States have a legitimate right to collect taxes on sales made to companies with a significant presence in that state 3. States can legally charge a use-tax on consumers for sales made to out of state companies 4. Congress can permit States to force out of state vendors to remit sales tax for in state customersHowever, since Congress has NOT done #4, and pretty much all states HAVE done #3, unless you have a significant presence in a state, thestate has no way to force you to remit sales tax for any transactionsdealing with citizens of their state. And only sales to customers instates where you have a presence are currently covered by sales tax.What the definition of significant presence is requires a lawyer.If you have a web server in TX and offices in LA, do you need to paytaxes? I don't know; I don't know that anyone does. If it is a co-location arrangement or a managed server (i.e. do you own the server) can make a difference.We have a warehouse in PA, our home office is in MD, and we havesatellite offices in CO, CA, IL, TN, NY. We charge sales tax in those seven states for all of our mail or phone orders (which includes any sales made on our web sites). If you want to be completely covered, have a page suggesting that anycustomer purchasing something from your site may owe a use tax to their state of residence. I am not currently worrying about this (I am just outside the DC beltway; I have other worries). Expect one ormore state to go after someone very big (Amazon comes to mind ;~) andtest the water. It is unlikely to affect anyone smaller for some years to come.The only thing that will happen immediately (IMHO) is that states willtry to start taxing Internet accounts. This is a completely seperateissue from the e-commerce aspect. See the third section titles NetTax Confusion of the above link for more details.My 2 centsJohn-- John PeacockDirector of Information Research and TechnologyRowman & Littlefield Publishing Group4720 Boston WayLanham, MD 20706301-459-3366 x.5010fax 301-429-5747-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
John Peacock
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Database Upload (2000)
WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997)
Smith Micro - no competition (2000)
Interface to Quickbooks (2005)
Problem with date and ranges (2002)
For those of you not on the WebCatalog Beta... (1997)
RE: WebCatalog2 for NT Beta Request (1997)
WebCat2_Mac RETURNs in .db (1997)
WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)
setlineiems and UnitShip Cost (2000)
WebDNA quitting (2008)
Make sure I understand this??? (1997)
[WebDNA] Base 64 (2010)
[writefile] (1997)
email messages (1997)
Almost a there but..bye bye NetCloak (1997)
Emails sent twice (2000)
Secure server question (1997)
carriage returns in data (1997)
[SubTotal] ??? (1998)