Re: relational db question

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 40925
interpreted = N
texte = On 6/25/02 3:33 PM, Donovan wrote:> aha, but which is faster? > both use two searches. > however, replace will replace as well as append. > > don't know if it is more efficient command though. > Donovan Through elapsed time around em. I do this all the time to find ways to save on processor load!Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  2. Re: relational db question (Bob Minor 2002)
  3. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  4. Re: relational db question (Ben Swihart 2002)
  5. Re: relational db question (Christer Olsson 2002)
  6. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  7. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  8. Re: relational db question (Ben Swihart 2002)
  9. Re: relational db question (Gary Krockover 2002)
  10. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  11. Re: relational db question (Rob Marquardt 2002)
  12. Re: relational db question (marc malacarme 2002)
  13. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  14. Re: relational db question (Ben Swihart 2002)
  15. Re: relational db question (Rob Marquardt 2002)
  16. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  17. Re: relational db question (marc malacarme 2002)
  18. Re: relational db question (Anup Setty 2002)
  19. relational db question (Ben Swihart 2002)
On 6/25/02 3:33 PM, Donovan wrote:> aha, but which is faster? > both use two searches. > however, replace will replace as well as append. > > don't know if it is more efficient command though. > Donovan Through elapsed time around em. I do this all the time to find ways to save on processor load!Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Bob Minor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

RE:math context ignores date prefs? (1998) Re:Emailer and encryption (1997) Undeliverable Mail (1997) Setting up shop (1997) [defined]ish (1997) Errata: WCS Newbie question (1997) WebCatalog.acgi quitting with error Type 2 (1998) [AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997) any WEBCAT gurus who are also PERL proficient? (1999) WebDNA Docs (2003) Whats going on? (2000) Using files in an Email broadcast (1999) WebCatalog stalls (1998) RE: E-mailer error codes (1997) Search design (1997) summ=T (2003) SSL and WebCatalog (1997) OT: Windows-based Code Editor (2002) Limit to Field Length in DB (1998) ShowNext Questions (2000)