Re: relational db question

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 40925
interpreted = N
texte = On 6/25/02 3:33 PM, Donovan wrote:> aha, but which is faster? > both use two searches. > however, replace will replace as well as append. > > don't know if it is more efficient command though. > Donovan Through elapsed time around em. I do this all the time to find ways to save on processor load!Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  2. Re: relational db question (Bob Minor 2002)
  3. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  4. Re: relational db question (Ben Swihart 2002)
  5. Re: relational db question (Christer Olsson 2002)
  6. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  7. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  8. Re: relational db question (Ben Swihart 2002)
  9. Re: relational db question (Gary Krockover 2002)
  10. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  11. Re: relational db question (Rob Marquardt 2002)
  12. Re: relational db question (marc malacarme 2002)
  13. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  14. Re: relational db question (Ben Swihart 2002)
  15. Re: relational db question (Rob Marquardt 2002)
  16. Re: relational db question (Donovan 2002)
  17. Re: relational db question (marc malacarme 2002)
  18. Re: relational db question (Anup Setty 2002)
  19. relational db question (Ben Swihart 2002)
On 6/25/02 3:33 PM, Donovan wrote:> aha, but which is faster? > both use two searches. > however, replace will replace as well as append. > > don't know if it is more efficient command though. > Donovan Through elapsed time around em. I do this all the time to find ways to save on processor load!Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Bob Minor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

japanese characters (1997) 1 cent answer? (1998) Time Tracking (2003) Major Security Hole (1998) remotely add + sign (1997) Colors (2000) TCP Connect (1999) Questions about maximum (1999) Navigator 4.0 & tables (1997) itools (2000) Unencrypt Password (2004) Associative lookup style? (1997) OSX Applescripts -- Anyone? please? (2004) webcatalog 3.0 upgrade (1998) RE: extended ASCII with middle command (1999) search command (1999) Firesite and WebCat (1999) urls (2005) [AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997) Changing price for a SLU based on options (size, etc.) (1997)