Re: A Show of Hands - Count WebCat Developers
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 41193
interpreted = N
texte = Donovan,I agree. It's voo doo statistics.But it can still be a measuring stick of sorts.While not all companies who have purchased Webcatalog have someone whomonitors this list or participates, any company that seriously developswebsites with webdna on an ongoing basis will have at least one person onthis list.So, let's say this is a measure of how many individuals have purchased acopy of webcatalog or work for a company that owns webcatalog and areserious enough about it to subscribe to this list.It could be way off. At best it just gives us a number to start our guessingfrom.....I like your idea for a database driven or ecommerse developers list. Signme upPaulOn 7/3/02 2:17 PM, Donovan
wrote:> Hi Paul, although this might be usefull I don't think it is accurate. In the> past> you have been a voice of how little webdna is used. I would broach> not all developers frequent the list. It *is* of course not at the volume of> the *standards* but there is nothing wrong being the niche solution.> > What would really be usefull is a non-specific list of developers..meaning...> you> could> call them database driven or ecommerse developers. This is how they would> be known to the public. The public would not know they are WebDNA developers> and> to> get your name on this list it would require that you are a WebDNA developer.> Yes,> it> is a bit of a trick but I'll bet many clients won't care about the technology> just> so long as it works.> > > Donovan> > Paul Uttermohlen wrote:> >> In response to Pedro's inquiry about how many people or companies use WebDNA>> I have created a page at http://uttermohlen.com/tasks/countme.htm to log IP>> addresses and provide a count. Visit to see what the count is up to. You>> won't be counted twice.>> >> Hit the link to help us count everyone on the list.>> >> Thanks, Paul> ___________________________________________________________________Paul Uttermohlenhttp://www.Uttermohlen.com/ (family)Web Services - site/server monitoring, hosting, server co-location,development, e-commerce, email and more5700 Saucony DriveHilliard, Ohio 43026614-529-8963 || 614-323-5146______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Donovan,I agree. It's voo doo statistics.But it can still be a measuring stick of sorts.While not all companies who have purchased Webcatalog have someone whomonitors this list or participates, any company that seriously developswebsites with webdna on an ongoing basis will have at least one person onthis list.So, let's say this is a measure of how many individuals have purchased acopy of webcatalog or work for a company that owns webcatalog and areserious enough about it to subscribe to this list.It could be way off. At best it just gives us a number to start our guessingfrom.....I like your idea for a database driven or ecommerse developers list. Signme upPaulOn 7/3/02 2:17 PM, Donovan wrote:> Hi Paul, although this might be usefull I don't think it is accurate. In the> past> you have been a voice of how little webdna is used. I would broach> not all developers frequent the list. It *is* of course not at the volume of> the *standards* but there is nothing wrong being the niche solution.> > What would really be usefull is a non-specific list of developers..meaning...> you> could> call them database driven or ecommerse developers. This is how they would> be known to the public. The public would not know they are WebDNA developers> and> to> get your name on this list it would require that you are a WebDNA developer.> Yes,> it> is a bit of a trick but I'll bet many clients won't care about the technology> just> so long as it works.> > > Donovan> > Paul Uttermohlen wrote:> >> In response to Pedro's inquiry about how many people or companies use WebDNA>> I have created a page at http://uttermohlen.com/tasks/countme.htm to log IP>> addresses and provide a count. Visit to see what the count is up to. You>> won't be counted twice.>> >> Hit the link to help us count everyone on the list.>> >> Thanks, Paul> ___________________________________________________________________Paul Uttermohlenhttp://www.Uttermohlen.com/ (family)Web Services - site/server monitoring, hosting, server co-location,development, e-commerce, email and more5700 Saucony DriveHilliard, Ohio 43026614-529-8963 || 614-323-5146______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Paul Uttermohlen
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
RE: [WebDNA] Scheduling App (2017)
[WebDNA] decrypt appears to be hosed (2008)
[BULK] [WebDNA] abstraction code can be tricky... (2012)
oops private message leaked into talk list (1997)
Removing [showif] makes a big difference in speed (1997)
sendmail error (1997)
lookup problem (2002)
FlushDatabase Suggestion (1998)
Templates for Customer Database? (1997)
WebCatalog sales (1997)
[WebDNA] Mac Question (2018)
Looking for a Manual (1997)
WebCatalog can't find database (1997)
Re:WebCatalog vidoes (was: Prices Dropped) (1998)
Nested tags count question (1997)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
Include remote? (1998)
[format 40s]text[/format] doesn't work (1997)
Card clearance, problems - solutions? (1997)
Feature Request: DB Field manipulation (1998)