Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 41436
interpreted = N
texte = So, would you say the syntax I'm using isn't the issue, since I can connect to two other servers without a problem? Any idea on what on the other server could cause the problem? I can't even get a response back to a simple GET request of a plain HTML page on this server.-----Original Message----- From: John Peacock [mailto:jpeacock@rowman.com] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:15 PM To: WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com Subject: Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations Jesse Williams-Proudman wrote: > Do I get free ice cream if I solve it? ;)Me too!> > I've always used [UnURL]%0D%0A[/UnURL]. I'm pretty sure it's not a platform > dependant thing but rather just the standard type of linefeeds that a > webserver expects. I've posted tcpconnect code before... Let me dig it up:The applicable RFC's specify that the HTTP header must contain CR/LF pairs as an end of line delimiter, regardless of the local O/S EOL. And the HTTP headermust be finished with two CR/LF pairs. Once in the body of the HTTP transfer (the HTML part), all bets are off; you can even have CR/CR/LF (as WebCat under NT does sometimes), which is just pure evil. ;~)John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5747 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
  2. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (John Peacock 2002)
  3. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (ScottR@benjerry.com 2002)
  4. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (ScottR@benjerry.com 2002)
  5. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (Pedro Rivera 2002)
  6. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (ScottR@benjerry.com 2002)
  7. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (ScottR@benjerry.com 2002)
  8. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (Pedro Rivera 2002)
  9. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
  10. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (John Peacock 2002)
  11. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (ScottR@benjerry.com 2002)
  12. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (Pedro Rivera 2002)
  13. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (ScottR@benjerry.com 2002)
  14. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (ScottR@benjerry.com 2002)
  15. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
  16. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (John Peacock 2002)
  17. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (ScottR@benjerry.com 2002)
  18. Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
  19. tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations (ScottR@benjerry.com 2002)
So, would you say the syntax I'm using isn't the issue, since I can connect to two other servers without a problem? Any idea on what on the other server could cause the problem? I can't even get a response back to a simple GET request of a plain HTML page on this server.-----Original Message----- From: John Peacock [mailto:jpeacock@rowman.com] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:15 PM To: WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com Subject: Re: tcpconnect/tcpsend frustrations Jesse Williams-Proudman wrote: > Do I get free ice cream if I solve it? ;)Me too!> > I've always used [unurl]%0D%0A[/UnURL]. I'm pretty sure it's not a platform > dependant thing but rather just the standard type of linefeeds that a > webserver expects. I've posted tcpconnect code before... Let me dig it up:The applicable RFC's specify that the HTTP header must contain CR/LF pairs as an end of line delimiter, regardless of the local O/S EOL. And the HTTP headermust be finished with two CR/LF pairs. Once in the body of the HTTP transfer (the HTML part), all bets are off; you can even have CR/CR/LF (as WebCat under NT does sometimes), which is just pure evil. ;~)John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5747 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ ScottR@benjerry.com

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

RE: Subtotal help (1997) Test (2003) Practice runs ? (1997) [WebDNA] XML Help (2009) Calendar Snippet (1998) Variables not being passed *back* (2000) Paranoid about serial numbers...not (1998) Founditems Add/remove graphic display problem (1999) Misunderstanding?? (1997) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) Order not created error (never mind) (1997) Make sure I understand this??? (1997) dynamic giffing. (2000) WebCatalog and Dreamweaver (1999) how to determine the actual file format of an image file? (2002) Error Page? (1997) emailer w/F2 (1997) cookies and [returnraw] (1997) Sorting by date (1997) timing out? (1997)