Re: Linux -> OS X
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 41856
interpreted = N
texte = On 7/23/02 12:05 PM, John Peacock mashed the following keys :> Jesse Williams-Proudman wrote: >> No they haven't. You can run HFS or UFS on your disks. HFS works just like >> it did in previous versions of the operating system > > You mean it is dog slow when hit with directories with thousands of files? ;~0 > Jesse is incorrect that our archive is 40,000 photos. The image archive we have online on an HFS partition, & it has about 800k images divided into 2 sets of 100 folders (small + Large), so about 4,000 jpegs in each sub folder.(there are 40,000 _current_ listings Jesse)HFS, OSX work fine. On old MACOS the finder would choke and die on about 1000 and take the entire system with it because it was not multithreaded. But there's nothing wrong with HFS' performance.Don't get me wrong, opening one of these folders in the GUI is a somewhat painful experience, but I daresay it's better than NT's performance doing the same thing. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
On 7/23/02 12:05 PM, John Peacock mashed the following keys :> Jesse Williams-Proudman wrote: >> No they haven't. You can run HFS or UFS on your disks. HFS works just like >> it did in previous versions of the operating system > > You mean it is dog slow when hit with directories with thousands of files? ;~0 > Jesse is incorrect that our archive is 40,000 photos. The image archive we have online on an HFS partition, & it has about 800k images divided into 2 sets of 100 folders (small + Large), so about 4,000 jpegs in each sub folder.(there are 40,000 _current_ listings Jesse)HFS, OSX work fine. On old MACOS the finder would choke and die on about 1000 and take the entire system with it because it was not multithreaded. But there's nothing wrong with HFS' performance.Don't get me wrong, opening one of these folders in the GUI is a somewhat painful experience, but I daresay it's better than NT's performance doing the same thing. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Aaron Lynch
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Shipping cost out of synch (1998)
protect tag on NT IIS (1997)
[createfolder] & [deletefolder] (1997)
alternate location for cookies (2001)
Showif, Hideif reverse logic ? (1997)
Some Questions (1997)
Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)
Need Sample Template - just purchased (1997)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
[WebDNA] showif with empty variable (2015)
Mondo amounts of Mail [long] (1999)
[OT] (waaaay OT) (2004)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
WebCatalog Mac 2.1b3 (1997)
Using Cookie for client specific info? (1997)
PCS Frames-Default page is solution! (1997)
Site Search Suggestions (2004)
b12 cannot limit records returned and more. (1997)
RE: IIS4b2 and WebCatalog b19 (1997)
snicker, snicker (1997)