Re: Feature Request : Separate [search] and [founditems]
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 42903
interpreted = N
texte = charles kline wrote:> What I would LOVE to see is this:> > [search name=mySearch&db=myData.db&eqSKUdatarq=1234]> > Here are the results:> [founditems search=mySearch]> [sku]: [product]> [/founditems]> > So what is the difference? Well... For one, search does not have a closing> tag and is NAMED. Founditems does not need to be nested. What this allows> for is a more object based development style that allows me to separate my> search objects from my display objects.> This has been requested in the past. If you are doing more than a single [search] on a page, you may be wasting your time and should be using [lookup] more often. However, I can see the option as being useful. It would require some significant change to the parser to permit both [search] context (with closing tag) and command (without).John-- John PeacockDirector of Information Research and TechnologyRowman & Littlefield Publishing Group4720 Boston WayLanham, MD 20706301-459-3366 x.5010fax 301-429-5747-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
charles kline wrote:> What I would LOVE to see is this:> > [search name=mySearch&db=myData.db&eqSKUdatarq=1234]> > Here are the results:> [founditems search=mySearch]> [sku]: [product]> [/founditems]> > So what is the difference? Well... For one, search does not have a closing> tag and is NAMED. Founditems does not need to be nested. What this allows> for is a more object based development style that allows me to separate my> search objects from my display objects.> This has been requested in the past. If you are doing more than a single [search] on a page, you may be wasting your time and should be using [lookup] more often. However, I can see the option as being useful. It would require some significant change to the parser to permit both [search] context (with closing tag) and command (without).John-- John PeacockDirector of Information Research and TechnologyRowman & Littlefield Publishing Group4720 Boston WayLanham, MD 20706301-459-3366 x.5010fax 301-429-5747-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
John Peacock
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
international time (1997)
What really killed WebDNA? (2007)
unsubscribe (1997)
filtering extra characters from credit card numbers (2001)
[WebDNA] TCPConnect Problem (2010)
Forcing a NEWCART (1997)
Issue with plug-in Webcat, webstar 4.x, SSL and IE when using the backbuttom (2000)
Hiding HTML and page breaks (1997)
Problems setting MIME Headers (1998)
Concatenating Form Variables (1998)
[cart] not being interpreted inside [founditems] (1997)
Nesting FoundItem Context (1997)
shownext not showing next...still r2 (1997)
WebCat and AppleShare 6.0 (1998)
Help!!!! Purchases not going through! (1997)
breaking words (1997)
WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)
Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)
passing user info on each page (2000)
Information on Vieworders.tpl (1998)