Re: WebDNA Mail issues

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 43507
interpreted = N
texte = On 9/17/02 11:28 PM, Alain Russell wrote:> Odds on it's not illegal - just not specified in the RFC specification. Some > mail servers and mail security systems are anal with stuff like this. > > I'm having problems with one of my clients who runs 'mail marshal' software > and filters their mail - it has problems with the smallest things. > > Mind you - what are standards for if no one adheres to them ?? Well I guess that's my point. Is it a deviation from an RFC specification or just a deviation from someone's standard?Thanks for you input.Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (John Peacock 2002)
  2. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (Bob Minor 2002)
  3. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (Alain Russell 2002)
  4. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (Bob Minor 2002)
  5. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (Alain Russell 2002)
  6. WebDNA Mail issues (Bob Minor 2002)
On 9/17/02 11:28 PM, Alain Russell wrote:> Odds on it's not illegal - just not specified in the RFC specification. Some > mail servers and mail security systems are anal with stuff like this. > > I'm having problems with one of my clients who runs 'mail marshal' software > and filters their mail - it has problems with the smallest things. > > Mind you - what are standards for if no one adheres to them ?? Well I guess that's my point. Is it a deviation from an RFC specification or just a deviation from someone's standard?Thanks for you input.Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Bob Minor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

RE: OK, here goes... (1997) Authorize.net? (2003) RE: textA and Title? (1997) emailer (1997) Reversed words (1997) To Err or Not Custom Error (1999) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) Still Learning (1997) Sort Order on a page search (1997) F3 crashing server (1997) Newbie questions (1999) [ModDate] & [ModTime] ? (1997) Can't load tmpl files (1997) Database wiped clean (2005) [Announce] Newest Commerce Site based on WebCatalog (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA 7 (2011) WebDNA Solutions ... sorry! (1997) Protect (1997) Server slowing down. (1997) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)