Re: WebDNA Mail issues

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 43507
interpreted = N
texte = On 9/17/02 11:28 PM, Alain Russell wrote:> Odds on it's not illegal - just not specified in the RFC specification. Some > mail servers and mail security systems are anal with stuff like this. > > I'm having problems with one of my clients who runs 'mail marshal' software > and filters their mail - it has problems with the smallest things. > > Mind you - what are standards for if no one adheres to them ?? Well I guess that's my point. Is it a deviation from an RFC specification or just a deviation from someone's standard?Thanks for you input.Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (John Peacock 2002)
  2. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (Bob Minor 2002)
  3. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (Alain Russell 2002)
  4. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (Bob Minor 2002)
  5. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (Alain Russell 2002)
  6. WebDNA Mail issues (Bob Minor 2002)
On 9/17/02 11:28 PM, Alain Russell wrote:> Odds on it's not illegal - just not specified in the RFC specification. Some > mail servers and mail security systems are anal with stuff like this. > > I'm having problems with one of my clients who runs 'mail marshal' software > and filters their mail - it has problems with the smallest things. > > Mind you - what are standards for if no one adheres to them ?? Well I guess that's my point. Is it a deviation from an RFC specification or just a deviation from someone's standard?Thanks for you input.Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Bob Minor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

multi-paragraph fields (1997) Subtotal help (1997) [WebDNA] Pretty URLS (2011) still facing truncated [texta] problem (2000) Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997) [WebDNA] Milage tracker (2014) WebCatalog 4.0.2b5 available (2000) bye bye tax rate (1998) Authorize.net, SIM, tcpconnect and applescript (2003) Playin Tricks (2006) Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) Summing fields (1997) Not really WebCat- (1997) Submit buttons not working.... (1999) Multiple transactions per cart (2000) Date problems (1997) WebCat2b14MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't hide the search string (1997) [OT] Display Glitch (2004) Date search - yes or no (1997) Hard Questions ? (1997)