Re: WebDNA Mail issues

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 43507
interpreted = N
texte = On 9/17/02 11:28 PM, Alain Russell wrote:> Odds on it's not illegal - just not specified in the RFC specification. Some > mail servers and mail security systems are anal with stuff like this. > > I'm having problems with one of my clients who runs 'mail marshal' software > and filters their mail - it has problems with the smallest things. > > Mind you - what are standards for if no one adheres to them ?? Well I guess that's my point. Is it a deviation from an RFC specification or just a deviation from someone's standard?Thanks for you input.Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (John Peacock 2002)
  2. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (Bob Minor 2002)
  3. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (Alain Russell 2002)
  4. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (Bob Minor 2002)
  5. Re: WebDNA Mail issues (Alain Russell 2002)
  6. WebDNA Mail issues (Bob Minor 2002)
On 9/17/02 11:28 PM, Alain Russell wrote:> Odds on it's not illegal - just not specified in the RFC specification. Some > mail servers and mail security systems are anal with stuff like this. > > I'm having problems with one of my clients who runs 'mail marshal' software > and filters their mail - it has problems with the smallest things. > > Mind you - what are standards for if no one adheres to them ?? Well I guess that's my point. Is it a deviation from an RFC specification or just a deviation from someone's standard?Thanks for you input.Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Bob Minor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Secure server question (1997) urls (2005) What Country (2004) Server IP address? (1998) Configuring E-mail (1997) Pithy questions on webcommerce & siteedit (1997) email error 159 (1998) Emailer Blackmail (1998) Beta version-Mac? (was Emailer update for Mac?) (1998) Typhoon Rev. and PCS store problems (1999) SKU lookup (1997) [Announce] Newest Commerce Site based on WebCatalog (1997) [WebDNA] incomplete redirect tag (2009) Apache suffix mapping for .tpl (2000) Rotating Banners ... (was LinkExchange) (1997) RE: Adding a product from another site (1997) Format of Required fields error message (1997) Bug Report, maybe (1997) .db-tmp (2000) Aquick question about replace (1999)