FW: Modtime bug?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 43823
interpreted = N
texte = ------ Forwarded MessageFrom: Glenn Busbin
Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk)Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:35:31To: (WebCatalog Talk)Subject: Re: Modtime bug?>> >> It appears to me that Webcat is reporting the last accessed time rather than>> the mod time, because in the finder, last modified is reported (correctly)>> as sept 15, but the moddate tag is reporting it as 'now'> > No. It's the createdate and createtime that show the last accessed time. The> mod tags seem to be ok.> > GlennRight, my bad on that one. It's createdate that is showing the files lastaccess. And like Brian mentioned the create date is often after the moddate, which makes not very much sense :)So we are officially calling that an OSX bug right Brian?(is it only OSX? Anyone with Linux see this?)Scott can you please confirm this for us and let me know if a fix might beforthcoming or if I should devise a workaround using [shell] or something?-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
|
- FW: Modtime bug? (Aaron Lynch 2002)
|
------ Forwarded MessageFrom: Glenn Busbin Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk)Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:35:31To: (WebCatalog Talk)Subject: Re: Modtime bug?>> >> It appears to me that Webcat is reporting the last accessed time rather than>> the mod time, because in the finder, last modified is reported (correctly)>> as sept 15, but the moddate tag is reporting it as 'now'> > No. It's the createdate and createtime that show the last accessed time. The> mod tags seem to be ok.> > GlennRight, my bad on that one. It's createdate that is showing the files lastaccess. And like Brian mentioned the create date is often after the moddate, which makes not very much sense :)So we are officially calling that an OSX bug right Brian?(is it only OSX? Anyone with Linux see this?)Scott can you please confirm this for us and let me know if a fix might beforthcoming or if I should devise a workaround using [shell] or something?-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Aaron Lynch
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
simple answer? [hideif] (1997)
woops - speed results - right subject (2002)
Finding max value for a field (1997)
ShowNext Page Style (2003)
Logic Help Needed (2003)
Where is f2? (1997)
Using Applescript to process WebCatalog functions (1998)
WebCat2.0b15-to many nested [xx] tags (1997)
Bug? (1997)
Summing fields (1997)
WebCat b13 CGI -shownext- (1997)
Sorting Numbers (1997)
Help! WebCat2 bug (Ben's input) (1997)
Major bug report on rootbeer (1997)
Testing band width (2002)
Re[2]: 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
Searchable Archive: Sender? (1998)
Re:Virtual hosting and webcatNT (1997)
flushing databases (2003)
foreign languages, email, webcat (1998)