About the cache management in Webstar V, under OS X

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 44812
interpreted = N
texte = Hello Everyone,Has anyone else seen a difference in the speed at which WebDNA is interpreted under OS X's Webstar V?For instance, using WebStar 4.4 with the WebCatalog 4.5 plug-in in MacOS 9, I achieved near immediate page display whereas in OS X, Webstar V seems to take -- a lot -- more time to display the exact same page.To have an example of this, go to http://superjobs.net and see how long it takes to have the page displayed in your browser. Before, when I was on OS 9, the page came up instantly (blink of an eye).So I'm wondering, what is the difference in the way the cache is handled under both systems?Thank you,-- Claude Gelinas, Chief Technology Officer SuperJobs.net Online Employment CentralMailto:cgelinas@superjobs.net http://www.superjobs.net/Phone: (418) 657-6184 Toll free: 1 866 783-2321Where dynamic employers find talented candidates. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: About the cache management in Webstar V, under OS X (Alain Russell 2002)
  2. About the cache management in Webstar V, under OS X (Claude Gelinas 2002)
Hello Everyone,Has anyone else seen a difference in the speed at which WebDNA is interpreted under OS X's Webstar V?For instance, using WebStar 4.4 with the WebCatalog 4.5 plug-in in MacOS 9, I achieved near immediate page display whereas in OS X, Webstar V seems to take -- a lot -- more time to display the exact same page.To have an example of this, go to http://superjobs.net and see how long it takes to have the page displayed in your browser. Before, when I was on OS 9, the page came up instantly (blink of an eye).So I'm wondering, what is the difference in the way the cache is handled under both systems?Thank you,-- Claude Gelinas, Chief Technology Officer SuperJobs.net Online Employment CentralMailto:cgelinas@superjobs.net http://www.superjobs.net/Phone: (418) 657-6184 Toll free: 1 866 783-2321Where dynamic employers find talented candidates. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Claude Gelinas

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

my SOS last week... (1996) Https not showing products (2004) WC results --> Access/Filemaker (1998) ShowNext (1997) Virtual Domains (1998) New Mac Emailer... (1997) RAM variables (1997) (2) Leading reasons for TCPConnect randomly failing? (1999) RE: Automatic Forwarding using WebCat (1997) japanese characters (1997) Looking for a host (1997) Shipcost lookup? (1997) WC2b15 File Corruption (1997) format problem on NT? (1997) Macauth: Dates and No Scripting... (1997) PIXO (1997) New public beta available (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997) Problems passing [SKU] with $Replace in 2.0 (1997) ReturnRaw and redirect one last question (1997)