Re: Stupid question

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 46843
interpreted = N
texte = Gary Krockover wrote: > Frank, > > Either nest your searches or throw a lookup in there. The online doc's have > some examples:That's not what I was looking for. We need to search two databases with the same field structure.The point is that there's this database file (from a message board) that's grown a bit too big to be practical, so we have to split it in two files, one with recent and one with old entries.Most searches only uses the recent entries database, but there's one special search that needs the entries from both bases.There are ways to work around the problem, but none we really like. And I *know* it's possible to specify multiple databases in a [SEARCH] command. I've done it before, but I just can't remember the syntax, and the feature seems to be undocumented. Frank Nordberg http://www.musicaviva.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. [WebDNA] Stupid question: setheader (Brian Burton 2017)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Probably a stupid question but... ("Diane Blackmore (Cohesion)" 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Probably a stupid question but... (Tom Duke 2009)
  4. [WebDNA] Probably a stupid question but... ("Diane Blackmore (Cohesion)" 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Stupid question about CentOS v4 and WebDNA v6 (Frank Nordberg 2008)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Stupid question about CentOS v4 and WebDNA v6 (Patrick McCormick 2008)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Stupid question about CentOS v4 and WebDNA v6 (Robert Sweet 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Stupid question about CentOS v4 and WebDNA v6 (Patrick McCormick 2008)
  9. [WebDNA] Stupid question about CentOS v4 and WebDNA v6 (Robert Sweet 2008)
  10. Stupid question about [grandtotal] formula ( Alan White 2004)
  11. Re: This is probably a stupid question... ( John Peacock 2004)
  12. Re: This is probably a stupid question... ( Stuart Tremain 2004)
  13. Re: This is probably a stupid question... ( John Peacock 2004)
  14. Re: This is probably a stupid question... ( Donovan Brooke 2004)
  15. Re: This is probably a stupid question... ( John Peacock 2004)
  16. Re: This is probably a stupid question... ( Rob Marquardt 2004)
  17. Re: This is probably a stupid question... ( Patrick J. 2004)
  18. Re: This is probably a stupid question... ( John Peacock 2004)
  19. Re: This is probably a stupid question... ( Rob Marquardt 2004)
  20. Re: This is probably a stupid question... ( Alan White 2004)
  21. Re: This is probably a stupid question... ( John Peacock 2004)
  22. This is probably a stupid question... ( Alan White 2004)
  23. Re: Stupid question (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  24. Re: Stupid question (Frank Nordberg 2003)
  25. Re: Stupid question (Brian Burton 2003)
  26. Re: Stupid question (John Peacock 2003)
  27. Re: Stupid question (Frank Nordberg 2003)
  28. Re: Stupid question (Gary Krockover 2003)
  29. Stupid question (Frank Nordberg 2003)
Gary Krockover wrote: > Frank, > > Either nest your searches or throw a lookup in there. The online doc's have > some examples:That's not what I was looking for. We need to search two databases with the same field structure.The point is that there's this database file (from a message board) that's grown a bit too big to be practical, so we have to split it in two files, one with recent and one with old entries.Most searches only uses the recent entries database, but there's one special search that needs the entries from both bases.There are ways to work around the problem, but none we really like. And I *know* it's possible to specify multiple databases in a [search] command. I've done it before, but I just can't remember the syntax, and the feature seems to be undocumented. Frank Nordberg http://www.musicaviva.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Frank Nordberg

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCat2.0 [format thousands .0f] no go (1997) Include a big block of text (1997) 2.0 Info (1997) Include vs. lookup-opps (1998) [WebDNA] linux linux linux (2009) 2.0Beta Command Ref (can't find this instruction) (1997) Cart Transfer from Un-Secure to Secure (2000) repost: I'd like the image this chunk of WEBDNA returns to be hyperlinked to the (2000) [Sum] function? (1997) Reversed words (1997) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) PCS Emailer's role ? (1997) Problems with ErrorLog on Linux (2000) Error:Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) RE: [BULK] [WebDNA] [if] or [case] or something else (2012) flash-wc (2000) For you Unix gurus [OT] (2002) Mail Service Dead (1998) Shopping Cart Problem (1998)