Re: Change to 5.0 per website licensing
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 48225
interpreted = N
texte = Why don't you grab the last two elements... Instead of throwing away the first.. On 2/28/03 4:57 PM, Phillip Bonesteele
wrote:> > Right now I can say the 'intent' is that domain1.com would be part of the > www.domain1.com, secure.domain1.com, group of website names included under > one 'instance' of a website license. > > Technically ... we know that detecting a domain name without any prefix is > an issue that does not yet have a simple solution. Scott Anderson is > investigating, so I don't want to comment yes or no until Scott has a chance > to come to a conclusion on how/if this can be accommodated without it > becoming a boat anchor to the engine, or has some recommended 'workaround' > on how to make that configuration to work. > > Phil B. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex McCombie [mailto:alex@newworldmedia.com] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 4:40 PM > To: WebDNA Talk > Subject: Re: Change to 5.0 per website licensing > > On 2/28/03 7:03 PM, Donovan wrote: > >> Phil, this looks to be exactly what we are looking for but I want to ask >> if you can clarify something (because my head can be thick at times). >> Along with the above, would: >> >> domain1.com >> www.domain1.com >> secure.domain1.com >> >> all be one license then? > I am not Phil, but I am going to bet that the answer is yes. Though Phil's > explanation regarding everything after the first . Is flawed due to the idea > of > Domain.com > > With no www. Or secure. Etc. > > However, I would bet my unlimited upgrade that SMSI will work around that > issue. > > Essentially it appears that subdomain/host/3rd level domain licensing has > been done away with and instead only the primary domain (the one you pay the > registrar the annual fee for) is attached to each license. > > But then again, I am not Phil ;-) > > > > Alex J McCombie New World Media > Chief Information Officer Drawer 607 > 800/724.8973 Fair Haven, NY 13064 > Alex@NewWorldMedia.com http://OurClients.com > > Interface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer > > -- Jay Van Vark 'Guiding Positive Change in High-Tech Companies' one box voicemail (866) 248-7670 x 6471 efax (801) 659-7952http://www.VanVark.net------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Why don't you grab the last two elements... Instead of throwing away the first.. On 2/28/03 4:57 PM, Phillip Bonesteele wrote:> > Right now I can say the 'intent' is that domain1.com would be part of the > www.domain1.com, secure.domain1.com, group of website names included under > one 'instance' of a website license. > > Technically ... we know that detecting a domain name without any prefix is > an issue that does not yet have a simple solution. Scott Anderson is > investigating, so I don't want to comment yes or no until Scott has a chance > to come to a conclusion on how/if this can be accommodated without it > becoming a boat anchor to the engine, or has some recommended 'workaround' > on how to make that configuration to work. > > Phil B. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex McCombie [mailto:alex@newworldmedia.com] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 4:40 PM > To: WebDNA Talk > Subject: Re: Change to 5.0 per website licensing > > On 2/28/03 7:03 PM, Donovan wrote: > >> Phil, this looks to be exactly what we are looking for but I want to ask >> if you can clarify something (because my head can be thick at times). >> Along with the above, would: >> >> domain1.com >> www.domain1.com >> secure.domain1.com >> >> all be one license then? > I am not Phil, but I am going to bet that the answer is yes. Though Phil's > explanation regarding everything after the first . Is flawed due to the idea > of > Domain.com > > With no www. Or secure. Etc. > > However, I would bet my unlimited upgrade that SMSI will work around that > issue. > > Essentially it appears that subdomain/host/3rd level domain licensing has > been done away with and instead only the primary domain (the one you pay the > registrar the annual fee for) is attached to each license. > > But then again, I am not Phil ;-) > > > > Alex J McCombie New World Media > Chief Information Officer Drawer 607 > 800/724.8973 Fair Haven, NY 13064 > Alex@NewWorldMedia.com http://OurClients.com > > Interface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer > > -- Jay Van Vark 'Guiding Positive Change in High-Tech Companies' one box voicemail (866) 248-7670 x 6471 efax (801) 659-7952http://www.VanVark.net------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Jay Van Vark
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
AUTONUMBER (2004)
HELP WITH DATES (1997)
PayFlow Pro - Changing the Amount that was Authorized (2003)
Limit on nested [ShowIf]'s? (1997)
emailer (1997)
PCS Frames (1997)
Paths, relative paths, webstar server setup and security (1997)
random prob (2003)
ErrorMessages.db (1998)
WebCatalog f2 Installation (1997)
Emailer (WebCat2) (1997)
emailer error -108 (1997)
&fieldsdir=ra truely random?? (2000)
Access Denied! But why? (1997)
PCS Emailer's role ? (1997)
pc (1997)
Multiple fields on 1 input (1997)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
Interactive Docs (2007)
the comparison character \ (2000)