Re: Authorize.net?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 48422
interpreted = N
texte = Yeah, I know what you're saying, it is just my understanding that this x_tran_key will be the feature that is required come April. From the AIM docs at authorizenet.com (http://www.authorizenet.com/support/AIM_guide.pdf):Minimum Requirements for AIMThe following is the minimum set of NAME/VALUE pairs that should be submitted to the gateway when using AIM for a credit card transaction.FIELD NAME FIELD VALUE x_Version 3.1 x_Delim_Data True x_Login Your Login ID x_Tran_Key Transaction key obtained from the Merchant Interface x_Amount Amount of purchase inclusive of taxThis version of AIM supports Transaction Key Last revised: 1/16/2003 ΖΙ 2003 Authorize.Net Corpx_Tran_Key Required Varies by merchant 16 Pass the transaction key obtained from the merchant interface.All I know is that my sites are/have been working for years now (with the once/twice a year changes that would break the code) and now it is going to drastically change. Bob, you're sending the exact same information that I am, except via TCPConnect. I've had a couple of support tech's at A/N look at the code and tell me that it will not fly once the 3.1 required upgrade to AIM/SIM takes effect. I'm just telling you what I've been told. Again, I think we're moving on just to avoid the mess altogether. Someone with the official word please set me straight if I'm incorrect.GK > I dunno, I followed their instructions in the aim docs. I didn't dive > too far into all the documentation. If you know something I don't..... > > as far as the password is concerned its not necessary but it doesn't > fail with it. I am not sure if the client had the required password > feature turned on. > > On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 06:00 PM, Gary Krockover wrote: > > > Isn't this just a relay response method that is being sent via a > > TCPConnect? > > If so, the relay response method is being phased out come April. > > > > The new AIM/SIM method will require a x_Tran_Key value (which I don't > > see on > > your example) which is a value obtained by the merchant interface and > > then > > returned back to the payment processor as a form of authentication. > > Also, > > it is my understanding that passing the x_password value will no > > longer be > > accepted in AIM/SIM. > > > > I very well could be entirely wrong about this, but instead of the > > nightmare > > that I forsee this thing causing, I think we've decided to move over to > > Verisign PayFlowPro. > > Robert Minor > Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Yeah, I know what you're saying, it is just my understanding that this x_tran_key will be the feature that is required come April. From the AIM docs at authorizenet.com (http://www.authorizenet.com/support/AIM_guide.pdf):Minimum Requirements for AIMThe following is the minimum set of NAME/VALUE pairs that should be submitted to the gateway when using AIM for a credit card transaction.FIELD NAME FIELD VALUE x_Version 3.1 x_Delim_Data True x_Login Your Login ID x_Tran_Key Transaction key obtained from the Merchant Interface x_Amount Amount of purchase inclusive of taxThis version of AIM supports Transaction Key Last revised: 1/16/2003 ΖΙ 2003 Authorize.Net Corpx_Tran_Key Required Varies by merchant 16 Pass the transaction key obtained from the merchant interface.All I know is that my sites are/have been working for years now (with the once/twice a year changes that would break the code) and now it is going to drastically change. Bob, you're sending the exact same information that I am, except via TCPConnect. I've had a couple of support tech's at A/N look at the code and tell me that it will not fly once the 3.1 required upgrade to AIM/SIM takes effect. I'm just telling you what I've been told. Again, I think we're moving on just to avoid the mess altogether. Someone with the official word please set me straight if I'm incorrect.GK > I dunno, I followed their instructions in the aim docs. I didn't dive > too far into all the documentation. If you know something I don't..... > > as far as the password is concerned its not necessary but it doesn't > fail with it. I am not sure if the client had the required password > feature turned on. > > On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 06:00 PM, Gary Krockover wrote: > > > Isn't this just a relay response method that is being sent via a > > TCPConnect? > > If so, the relay response method is being phased out come April. > > > > The new AIM/SIM method will require a x_Tran_Key value (which I don't > > see on > > your example) which is a value obtained by the merchant interface and > > then > > returned back to the payment processor as a form of authentication. > > Also, > > it is my understanding that passing the x_password value will no > > longer be > > accepted in AIM/SIM. > > > > I very well could be entirely wrong about this, but instead of the > > nightmare > > that I forsee this thing causing, I think we've decided to move over to > > Verisign PayFlowPro. > > Robert Minor > Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Gary Krockover
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WC2b15 - [HTMLx]...[/HTMLx] problems (1997)
[WebDNA] Comparing 2 MySQL tables (2009)
RAM variables (1997)
notification solutions (1997)
searching a range -still don't get it (2000)
[SearchString] problem with [search] context (1997)
Variable Prices (1998)
[isfolder] and [filename] (1997)
off topic - dna snipets (1997)
Version Question (2000)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997)
My web page only... (2003)
FAX orders (1996)
shipCost formula (1997)
[WebDNA] Problem with administration (2009)
Javascript Form Validation (2002)
users.db (1999)
RE: [WebDNA] Build Name for 6.1 (2008)
Protect and Serve (1999)
Setting up shop (1997)