Re: Log-in Scheme
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 48594
interpreted = N
texte = Kenneth Grome wrote:> >can anyone think of a reason not to use a header? > > Yes, it's a lot more CPU intensive than a search or a lookup in an > already-open webdna db file, and it's slower than a search, and it > takes more webdna resources.Thanks Ken. You are pretty much correct however you might find this interesting??. I decided to do a test using elapsedtime.I first show the time of setting the headers because this is a one time thing using the cart method (after it is set, it is negated for each new page). I then show the difference of times of using a search or accessing the orderfile. I do this by looping both the search and the orderfile 20 times. (ie opening and closing the orderfile 20 times and in comparison starting and stopping the search 20 times.)My conclusion is that the orderfile is a bit slower. However, I don't know that it could be considered a performance hinderance... we are talking 1 or 2 tics with 20 (near simoltaneous log-ons).Here is the simple test if interested: http://216.81.241.229/tests/elapse/index.htmlCheers, Donovan > > -- > > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Kenneth Grome wrote:> >can anyone think of a reason not to use a header? > > Yes, it's a lot more CPU intensive than a search or a lookup in an > already-open webdna db file, and it's slower than a search, and it > takes more webdna resources.Thanks Ken. You are pretty much correct however you might find this interesting??. I decided to do a test using elapsedtime.I first show the time of setting the headers because this is a one time thing using the cart method (after it is set, it is negated for each new page). I then show the difference of times of using a search or accessing the orderfile. I do this by looping both the search and the orderfile 20 times. (ie opening and closing the orderfile 20 times and in comparison starting and stopping the search 20 times.)My conclusion is that the orderfile is a bit slower. However, I don't know that it could be considered a performance hinderance... we are talking 1 or 2 tics with 20 (near simoltaneous log-ons).Here is the simple test if interested: http://216.81.241.229/tests/elapse/index.htmlCheers, Donovan > > -- > > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Donovan home EHG
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Db crash in win98 (2000)
[WebDNA] generic Ajax question: storing a variable site-wide (2009)
Another search question please... (1998)
Another Search Question (2003)
[OT] Good javascript book? (2002)
Serial Number Question (1997)
WC on Mac OS X or Mac OS X Server 2.x (2001)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - more [date] problems (1997)
Problem 2 of 2 (was: Shipping Confusion) (2000)
SiteGuard Admin Feature ? (1997)
Showing unopened cart (1997)
[UPPERCASE] (1997)
More on the email templates (1997)
Price problem (1997)
Bug Report, maybe (1997)
Re1000001: Setting up shop (1997)
problems with 2 tags (1997)
Page Hanging (2006)
BUG in [showif] using ^ (contains) (1997)
Rendering out a page (1997)