Authorize.net and AIM

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 48801
interpreted = N
texte = I'm having a bit of trouble implementing the new AIM standard...Currently:We serve the formuser submits form to Auth.NetAuth net submits form to relay page, grabs page and serves to userNew AIM:We Serve the formuser submits form to uswe submit form to Auth.NetAuth.net submits form to usWe serve page back to userSo, How does one go about posting form variables without user interaction? Obviously we can't just pass them via the URL... that defeats the purpose of the security. I talked with one of the tech reps at Auth.Net yesterday, so I'm not misunderstanding the new implementation. They are doing away with the Relay Response.How is everyone else handling this?-- Matthew C. BohneWeb DeveloperSandusky Register314 W. Market St.Sandusky, OH 44870419-625-5500 ext. 253matthewbohne@sanduskyregister.comhttp://www.sanduskyregister.com-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: Authorize.Net and AIM ( Brian Fries 2004) Re: Authorize.Net and AIM ( "James D. Wilson" 2004) Re: Authorize.Net and AIM ( "James D. Wilson" 2004) Re: Authorize.Net and AIM ( "Sal" 2004) Re: Authorize.Net and AIM ( "Matthew C. Bohne" 2004) Authorize.Net and AIM ( "James D. Wilson" 2004) Re: Authorize.net and AIM (Bob Minor 2003) Authorize.net and AIM (Matthew Bohne 2003)

I'm having a bit of trouble implementing the new AIM standard...Currently:We serve the formuser submits form to Auth.NetAuth net submits form to relay page, grabs page and serves to userNew AIM:We Serve the formuser submits form to uswe submit form to Auth.NetAuth.net submits form to usWe serve page back to userSo, How does one go about posting form variables without user interaction? Obviously we can't just pass them via the URL... that defeats the purpose of the security. I talked with one of the tech reps at Auth.Net yesterday, so I'm not misunderstanding the new implementation. They are doing away with the Relay Response.How is everyone else handling this?-- Matthew C. BohneWeb DeveloperSandusky Register314 W. Market St.Sandusky, OH 44870419-625-5500 ext. 253matthewbohne@sanduskyregister.comhttp://www.sanduskyregister.com-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Matthew Bohne

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Execute Applescript (1997) [BoldWords] WebCat.acgib15Mac (1997) Answer: WebDelivery downloads alias, not original ? (1997) Comments in db? (1997) lookup (1998) [WebDNA] sales tax on shipping (2008) WebDNA Speed Test (2008) process SSI (1998) SiteBuilder Problem (2004) webdna code shows on .htm extensions. (2000) Re:Message Board (1998) Emailer Problem (1998) Help name our technology! I found it (1997) Web Hosters with WebCatalog support (2000) Date Range works (1997) WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997) international time (1997) fixed date problem (1997) how does [break] work? (1998) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997)