Re: Search Result refinement help

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 52886
interpreted = N
texte = O.K. After searching through the appendixC I found: # [Search] context - New FBRK (field break) option for WW, and SW field comparisons. Specifies the delimiters used when doing a word compare in the field data itself. Thus: woDESCRIPTIONdatarq=2&DESCRIPTIONword=WW&DESCRIPTIONfbrk=[url],[/url] in the search string would not find a result if the field data is "400.2", whereas it would if the FBRK option was not specified. # New 'Safe-Write' preference - Enabl Gripe! This is not in the word breaks section of the docs! O.K. So now I have this: > I have: > [search db=admin/some.db&[!] > [/!]woTHE_FIELDdatarq=TY 4,TY 6,TY 39,RU 34&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDword=ww&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDwbrk=,&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDfbrk=[url],[/url]&[!] > [/!]Allreqd=T&[!] > [/!]allblnk=T] This still finds the "400.2". Anyone? I found a thread in the archives that I think is what lead up to the "fbrk" fix including Tim, John H, Alain etc. What am I doing wrong here? Thanks, Donovan Donovan wrote: > Hello, > I'm not seeing the solution here and thought someone else might. > > I have: > [search db=admin/some.db&[!] > [/!]woTHE_FIELDdatarq=TY 4,TY 6,TY 39,RU 34&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDword=ww&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDwbrk=,&[!] > [/!]Allreqd=T&[!] > [/!]allblnk=T] > > The issue is the above will find records like: > TY 4.3 > TY 39.5 > RU 34.8 > > You get the idea. > > What is the best way to find these exact records? > Note that the search values *are* [url][/url]'d in the > original search. > > Thanks, > Donovan > > -- =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o DONOVAN D. BROOKE Eucalyptus Design Developer / Consultant <-Web Development (specializing in eCommerce), -> <-Graphic Design, and Pre-Press Consultation -> ADDRESS:> Donovan Brooke DBA Eucalyptus Design P.O. Box 260153 Madison, WI 53726-0153 PH:> 1.608.592.3567 email:> dbrooke@euca.us Web:> http://www.euca.us =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
  2. Re: Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
  3. Re: Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
  4. Re: Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
  5. Re: Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
  6. Re: Search Result refinement help ( "WebDna @" 2003)
  7. Re: Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
  8. Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
O.K. After searching through the appendixC I found: # [search] context - New FBRK (field break) option for WW, and SW field comparisons. Specifies the delimiters used when doing a word compare in the field data itself. Thus: woDESCRIPTIONdatarq=2&DESCRIPTIONword=WW&DESCRIPTIONfbrk=[url],[/url] in the search string would not find a result if the field data is "400.2", whereas it would if the FBRK option was not specified. # New 'Safe-Write' preference - Enabl Gripe! This is not in the word breaks section of the docs! O.K. So now I have this: > I have: > [search db=admin/some.db&[!] > [/!]woTHE_FIELDdatarq=TY 4,TY 6,TY 39,RU 34&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDword=ww&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDwbrk=,&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDfbrk=[url],[/url]&[!] > [/!]Allreqd=T&[!] > [/!]allblnk=T] This still finds the "400.2". Anyone? I found a thread in the archives that I think is what lead up to the "fbrk" fix including Tim, John H, Alain etc. What am I doing wrong here? Thanks, Donovan Donovan wrote: > Hello, > I'm not seeing the solution here and thought someone else might. > > I have: > [search db=admin/some.db&[!] > [/!]woTHE_FIELDdatarq=TY 4,TY 6,TY 39,RU 34&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDword=ww&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDwbrk=,&[!] > [/!]Allreqd=T&[!] > [/!]allblnk=T] > > The issue is the above will find records like: > TY 4.3 > TY 39.5 > RU 34.8 > > You get the idea. > > What is the best way to find these exact records? > Note that the search values *are* [url][/url]'d in the > original search. > > Thanks, > Donovan > > -- =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o DONOVAN D. BROOKE Eucalyptus Design Developer / Consultant <-Web Development (specializing in eCommerce), -> <-Graphic Design, and Pre-Press Consultation -> ADDRESS:> Donovan Brooke DBA Eucalyptus Design P.O. Box 260153 Madison, WI 53726-0153 PH:> 1.608.592.3567 email:> dbrooke@euca.us Web:> http://www.euca.us =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Donovan

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WC 2.0 frames feature (1997) Template Not Found (1998) [OT] .php3 extension (2000) [OT] Security Certs (2000) Can you identify the [body]? (1999) send mail problem? (1997) Encrypt Decrypt URL UnURL Weirdness (2001) [isfile] ? (1997) suffix mapping for NT? (1997) f2 download problems (1997) My URL, Your URL (2002) Include a big block of text (1997) Trouble with formula.db (1997) plugin-acgi, different results (1997) Verifying both name and password (was: New Problem) (1997) UH OH (1999) Authenticate (1997) I think WebDNA-Talk died ... :( (1997) [WebDNA] [ipaddress] - [RealIP] - Not working properly (2016) I give up!! (1997)