Re: Search Result refinement help

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 52886
interpreted = N
texte = O.K. After searching through the appendixC I found: # [Search] context - New FBRK (field break) option for WW, and SW field comparisons. Specifies the delimiters used when doing a word compare in the field data itself. Thus: woDESCRIPTIONdatarq=2&DESCRIPTIONword=WW&DESCRIPTIONfbrk=[url],[/url] in the search string would not find a result if the field data is "400.2", whereas it would if the FBRK option was not specified. # New 'Safe-Write' preference - Enabl Gripe! This is not in the word breaks section of the docs! O.K. So now I have this: > I have: > [search db=admin/some.db&[!] > [/!]woTHE_FIELDdatarq=TY 4,TY 6,TY 39,RU 34&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDword=ww&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDwbrk=,&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDfbrk=[url],[/url]&[!] > [/!]Allreqd=T&[!] > [/!]allblnk=T] This still finds the "400.2". Anyone? I found a thread in the archives that I think is what lead up to the "fbrk" fix including Tim, John H, Alain etc. What am I doing wrong here? Thanks, Donovan Donovan wrote: > Hello, > I'm not seeing the solution here and thought someone else might. > > I have: > [search db=admin/some.db&[!] > [/!]woTHE_FIELDdatarq=TY 4,TY 6,TY 39,RU 34&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDword=ww&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDwbrk=,&[!] > [/!]Allreqd=T&[!] > [/!]allblnk=T] > > The issue is the above will find records like: > TY 4.3 > TY 39.5 > RU 34.8 > > You get the idea. > > What is the best way to find these exact records? > Note that the search values *are* [url][/url]'d in the > original search. > > Thanks, > Donovan > > -- =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o DONOVAN D. BROOKE Eucalyptus Design Developer / Consultant <-Web Development (specializing in eCommerce), -> <-Graphic Design, and Pre-Press Consultation -> ADDRESS:> Donovan Brooke DBA Eucalyptus Design P.O. Box 260153 Madison, WI 53726-0153 PH:> 1.608.592.3567 email:> dbrooke@euca.us Web:> http://www.euca.us =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
  2. Re: Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
  3. Re: Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
  4. Re: Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
  5. Re: Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
  6. Re: Search Result refinement help ( "WebDna @" 2003)
  7. Re: Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
  8. Search Result refinement help ( Donovan 2003)
O.K. After searching through the appendixC I found: # [search] context - New FBRK (field break) option for WW, and SW field comparisons. Specifies the delimiters used when doing a word compare in the field data itself. Thus: woDESCRIPTIONdatarq=2&DESCRIPTIONword=WW&DESCRIPTIONfbrk=[url],[/url] in the search string would not find a result if the field data is "400.2", whereas it would if the FBRK option was not specified. # New 'Safe-Write' preference - Enabl Gripe! This is not in the word breaks section of the docs! O.K. So now I have this: > I have: > [search db=admin/some.db&[!] > [/!]woTHE_FIELDdatarq=TY 4,TY 6,TY 39,RU 34&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDword=ww&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDwbrk=,&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDfbrk=[url],[/url]&[!] > [/!]Allreqd=T&[!] > [/!]allblnk=T] This still finds the "400.2". Anyone? I found a thread in the archives that I think is what lead up to the "fbrk" fix including Tim, John H, Alain etc. What am I doing wrong here? Thanks, Donovan Donovan wrote: > Hello, > I'm not seeing the solution here and thought someone else might. > > I have: > [search db=admin/some.db&[!] > [/!]woTHE_FIELDdatarq=TY 4,TY 6,TY 39,RU 34&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDword=ww&[!] > [/!]THE_FIELDwbrk=,&[!] > [/!]Allreqd=T&[!] > [/!]allblnk=T] > > The issue is the above will find records like: > TY 4.3 > TY 39.5 > RU 34.8 > > You get the idea. > > What is the best way to find these exact records? > Note that the search values *are* [url][/url]'d in the > original search. > > Thanks, > Donovan > > -- =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o DONOVAN D. BROOKE Eucalyptus Design Developer / Consultant <-Web Development (specializing in eCommerce), -> <-Graphic Design, and Pre-Press Consultation -> ADDRESS:> Donovan Brooke DBA Eucalyptus Design P.O. Box 260153 Madison, WI 53726-0153 PH:> 1.608.592.3567 email:> dbrooke@euca.us Web:> http://www.euca.us =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Donovan

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Emailer setup (1997) Secure Server (1997) To Err or Not Custom Error (1999) Cross-platform file names? (2000) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) [Announce]: Web server security and password protection (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997) Problem with updating to 2.1.1 (1998) Superfilous Characters (1998) Dates (1998) Bug? (1997) Can't get appendfile to work (1997) Limiting user access to .tmpl files (1997) Not really WebCat (1997) Running _every_ page through WebCat-error.html (1997) Single Link browsing (1997) Robots fill event log (1997) Errata: WCS Newbie question (1997) Multiple prices (1997)