Re: Automatic [URL]ing by the webdna engine
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53747
interpreted = N
texte = NO NO NO!!!!This would slow down the WebDNA parser by adding another complex code parsing pass, and it would break hundreds if not thousands of pages I have written!See my reply on the original "Re: [URL] and [showif] or [hideif] comparisons" subject for my full treatise, but take this simple example of something I do frequently:[if ("[exact]"="T")][then][text]tSearch=eqSKUdata=[url][var1][/url][/text][/then][else][text]tSearch=bwSKUdata=[url][var1][/url][/text][/else][/if][search db=product.db&[tSearch]]...If WebDNA automatically inserted [url]s around my [tSearch] variable, it would destroy my search.- brianOn Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 05:06 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote:>> Yes. So would it slow everything down enormously if the showif and >> hideif>> did it automatically?>> URL is not done automatically anywhere. If this feature were > implemented, the webdna engine would have to be rewritten so that it > would dynamically insert these tags into our code before that code is > processed. I assume that something like this would have to be > implemented:::>> 1- read the original webdna code into RAM> 2- scan that code to identify the proper locations for dynamic url tag > insertion> 3- insert [url] and [/url] tags into the properly identified locations> 4- interpret the resulting code and return the results>> If the engine were rewritten to perform this task for showifs and > hideif's, it should *also* be made to similarly url the values in > every append, replace and delete context -- as well as url everything > else that should be urled in order to make webdna work properly.>> Rewriting the webdna engine like this would probably be a difficult > task ... but if it were done, it would make our work as webdna > programmers *much* faster and easier!>> It seems to me that an improvement like this would be appreciated by > EVERYONE (instead of just a handful of webdna programmers with > specific needs) assuming that SMSI make it work properly of course. > And I think that if it were implemented, we should also be given a new > pref that will let us turn it on and/or off ourselves.>> What do you guys thing? Is this a feature that SMSI should consider > placing at (or near) the top of their list of improvements for the > next release?> -- >> Sincerely,> Kenneth Grome> -------------------------------------------------------------> Outsource your WebDNA programming for $18 an hour or less!> ------------------------------------------------------------->-- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com ---------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
NO NO NO!!!!This would slow down the WebDNA parser by adding another complex code parsing pass, and it would break hundreds if not thousands of pages I have written!See my reply on the original "Re: [url] and [showif] or [hideif] comparisons" subject for my full treatise, but take this simple example of something I do frequently:[if ("[exact]"="T")][then][text]tSearch=eqSKUdata=[url][var1][/url][/text][/then][else][text]tSearch=bwSKUdata=[url][var1][/url][/text][/else][/if][search db=product.db&[tSearch]]...If WebDNA automatically inserted [url]s around my [tSearch] variable, it would destroy my search.- brianOn Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 05:06 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote:>> Yes. So would it slow everything down enormously if the showif and >> hideif>> did it automatically?>> URL is not done automatically anywhere. If this feature were > implemented, the webdna engine would have to be rewritten so that it > would dynamically insert these tags into our code before that code is > processed. I assume that something like this would have to be > implemented:::>> 1- read the original webdna code into RAM> 2- scan that code to identify the proper locations for dynamic url tag > insertion> 3- insert [url] and [/url] tags into the properly identified locations> 4- interpret the resulting code and return the results>> If the engine were rewritten to perform this task for showifs and > hideif's, it should *also* be made to similarly url the values in > every append, replace and delete context -- as well as url everything > else that should be urled in order to make webdna work properly.>> Rewriting the webdna engine like this would probably be a difficult > task ... but if it were done, it would make our work as webdna > programmers *much* faster and easier!>> It seems to me that an improvement like this would be appreciated by > EVERYONE (instead of just a handful of webdna programmers with > specific needs) assuming that SMSI make it work properly of course. > And I think that if it were implemented, we should also be given a new > pref that will let us turn it on and/or off ourselves.>> What do you guys thing? Is this a feature that SMSI should consider > placing at (or near) the top of their list of improvements for the > next release?> -- >> Sincerely,> Kenneth Grome> -------------------------------------------------------------> Outsource your WebDNA programming for $18 an hour or less!> ------------------------------------------------------------->-- Brian Fries, BrainScan Software -- http://www.brainscansoftware.com ---------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Brian Fries
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[OT] Looking to make hosting acquisition (2006)
[WebDNA] Need Rosetta to install on OS X? (2010)
RE: Formulas.db + Users.db (1997)
webcat- multiple selection in input field (1997)
Anomaly ? causes NT application event log to overflow (1997)
Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
Banners and sort of random display (1997)
OT: Unix Guru Needed (2003)
About WebDNA (2006)
WebMerchant and good orders (1999)
problems with 2 tags (1997)
sendmail for email (was Netforms) (1998)
Calendar using WebCatalog? (1997)
Playin Tricks (2006)
Modtime bug? (2002)
Round up prices (2000)
Re:quit command on NT (1997)
WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997)
dates and hex formatting (1997)
[Webcat 2]Next (1997)