Re: Problem with broken images

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2004


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 56746
interpreted = N
texte = - I'm serving on W* 5.3.2 on OS 10.2 - I have compared the source data from a couple of browsers that showed a broken image, but the html is OK - Images do work for _most_ users. (I hate it when that happens. All or none would be much preferable.) > Is webdna setting the [rid] value or is this a file name that's > picked up by the browser when the visitor selects the file to be > uploaded? Maybe the file name is sometimes incompatible with the OS > you're using which is ... ? [rid] is the unique number of the forum post, pulled from a db. I also use it as the file name to make sure all the image are also unique and eliminate the need for another search. > Are your visitors actually uploading image files? Many times on my > jobs website the visitors fail to recognize that a word file with a > picture in it is not a .gif or a .jpg file. The file is uploaded > properly but cannot be displayed so the browser shows its 'broken > image" icon instead. Yes, they are uploading themselves and we do get a little junk. But they get to preview the upload before they post it (and abort if doesn't display) which has cut down on the trash. But as I said, it works for most, and for every user on XP / IE 6.x who gets a broken image I have another who can load it just fine. My current theory is that popup killers or other security software doesn't like the numeric image file names (or the two dots) but I don't have enough evidence (or understanding of those utilities) to know for sure. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Problem with broken images ( "Gary Krockover" 2004)
  2. Re: Problem with broken images ( "WebDna @ Inkblot Media" 2004)
  3. Re: Problem with broken images ( "WebDna @ Inkblot Media" 2004)
  4. Re: Problem with broken images ( Tim Robinson 2004)
  5. Re: Problem with broken images ( "WebDna @ Inkblot Media" 2004)
  6. Re: Problem with broken images ( Phil Herring 2004)
  7. Re: Problem with broken images ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  8. Re: Problem with broken images ( Phil Herring 2004)
  9. Re: Problem with broken images ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  10. Re: Problem with broken images ( Tim Robinson 2004)
  11. Re: Problem with broken images ( Stuart Tremain 2004)
  12. Re: Problem with broken images ( devaulw@onebox.com 2004)
  13. Re: Problem with broken images ( Mark Derrick 2004)
  14. Problem with broken images ( Phil Herring 2004)
- I'm serving on W* 5.3.2 on OS 10.2 - I have compared the source data from a couple of browsers that showed a broken image, but the html is OK - Images do work for _most_ users. (I hate it when that happens. All or none would be much preferable.) > Is webdna setting the [rid] value or is this a file name that's > picked up by the browser when the visitor selects the file to be > uploaded? Maybe the file name is sometimes incompatible with the OS > you're using which is ... ? [rid] is the unique number of the forum post, pulled from a db. I also use it as the file name to make sure all the image are also unique and eliminate the need for another search. > Are your visitors actually uploading image files? Many times on my > jobs website the visitors fail to recognize that a word file with a > picture in it is not a .gif or a .jpg file. The file is uploaded > properly but cannot be displayed so the browser shows its 'broken > image" icon instead. Yes, they are uploading themselves and we do get a little junk. But they get to preview the upload before they post it (and abort if doesn't display) which has cut down on the trash. But as I said, it works for most, and for every user on XP / IE 6.x who gets a broken image I have another who can load it just fine. My current theory is that popup killers or other security software doesn't like the numeric image file names (or the two dots) but I don't have enough evidence (or understanding of those utilities) to know for sure. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Phil Herring

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Updating a database once per day - An example (1998) WebCatalog [FoundItems] Problem - AGAIN - (1997) Announce: New WebCatalog Site (1998) math problems (2000) Using [Showif] tag. Mac (1997) Price recalc based on quantity (1997) TCPCONNECT (2004) [WebDNA] Auto Suggest Form (2014) WebCat for Unix?? (1997) WebCat & Backoffice Solution? (2000) Searching multiple fields (1997) A quickie question (1997) [SHOWIF AND/OR] (1997) [Replace] (2000) Re2: frames & carts (1997) Getting Started (2003) [WebDNA] Dynamic vertical columns (2008) grouping nothing (2000) WC2b15 File Corruption (1997) Closing Databases (1998)