Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2004


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 57014
interpreted = N
texte = All of this cloaking, hiding, masking, and redirection seems like a lot of trouble and has the potential for a weak link breaking somewhere. The whole problem would be solved if both sites were hosted on a WC-equipped machine. Is this not feasible? Glenn ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Joe D'Andrea 2004)
  2. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  3. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Glenn Busbin 2004)
  4. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( "Sal" 2004)
  5. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Mark Derrick 2004)
  6. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Mark Derrick 2004)
  7. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Joe D'Andrea 2004)
  8. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  9. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( "Sal" 2004)
  10. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  11. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( "Sal" 2004)
  12. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  13. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  14. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( "Sal" 2004)
  15. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  16. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Tim Robinson 2004)
  17. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Frank Nordberg 2004)
  18. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Gary Krockover 2004)
  19. Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
All of this cloaking, hiding, masking, and redirection seems like a lot of trouble and has the potential for a weak link breaking somewhere. The whole problem would be solved if both sites were hosted on a WC-equipped machine. Is this not feasible? Glenn ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Glenn Busbin

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

writing db to disk (1997) When do we get to request new features? (1999) Extended [ConvertChars] (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997) Secure server question (1997) New commands in Final candidate (1997) Q: how long for answers to the WebDNA-Talk list? (1997) [WebDNA] site becomes unavailable and WebCatalog warnings (2017) Navigator Parsing (1997) Re:Emailer and encryption (1997) formula's (1998) WebCat2: Found Items syntax, etc. (1997) DNS Lookup (2000) Make sure I understand this??? (1997) Webcat run amuk (2002) SERIAL NUMBER BEING LOST AGAIN!!! (1999) problems with 2 tags (1997) [TaxableTotal] - not working with AOL and IE (1997) WebCatalog Hosting (1996) format crash! (1997)