Re: Suffix Slowdown?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2004
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 57264
interpreted = N
texte = Several years ago WebDNA used to have a faster cache than webstar, but things may have changed since then. Nevertheless, if there's no webdna to interpret I doubt that you will notice a difference.>Good Morning,>>I'm running 5.1 (soon to be 6) on Mac OSX 10.3... I have a new >hosting client that would like to transfer his site to ours. The >problem is that he uses WebDNA in every page but his suffixes are >all .tmpl or.html>>If I go ahead and process the .html suffix for WebDNA will the rest >of my hosting clients that don't use WebDNA, suffer in performance >due to having to be checked out by the WebDNA compiler before being >served?>>My terminology may not be correct but I hope you get the point of my >question. Thanks!>>Gregg>-->Gregg Luhring
>3W Design Group, Inc. * >Voice: 920-854-9459 ext.108 * Fax: 920-854-5327>>>------------------------------------------------------------->This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-- Kenneth GromeWebDNA ProgrammerOutsource Service ProviderPhone: +6332 255-6591-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Several years ago WebDNA used to have a faster cache than webstar, but things may have changed since then. Nevertheless, if there's no webdna to interpret I doubt that you will notice a difference.>Good Morning,>>I'm running 5.1 (soon to be 6) on Mac OSX 10.3... I have a new >hosting client that would like to transfer his site to ours. The >problem is that he uses WebDNA in every page but his suffixes are >all .tmpl or.html>>If I go ahead and process the .html suffix for WebDNA will the rest >of my hosting clients that don't use WebDNA, suffer in performance >due to having to be checked out by the WebDNA compiler before being >served?>>My terminology may not be correct but I hope you get the point of my >question. Thanks!>>Gregg>-->Gregg Luhring >3W Design Group, Inc. * >Voice: 920-854-9459 ext.108 * Fax: 920-854-5327>>>------------------------------------------------------------->This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-- Kenneth GromeWebDNA ProgrammerOutsource Service ProviderPhone: +6332 255-6591-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
shipping calcs (1998)
page redirect in webDNA (1997)
error: Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
Where is f2? (1997)
Online reference (1997)
Help: Append context problems (1999)
Field name-subcategory (1997)
Counting LineItems (2000)
Need relative path explanation (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugin - [math][date][/math] problem (1997)
Form Weirdness (2002)
PhotoMill -> PhotoMaster (1997)
Add more fields to an existent data base (1997)
Multiple Users.db Possible? (1997)
WebDelivery downloads alias, not original ? (1997)
Include Files (1998)
Plugin or CGI or both (1997)
Writing [raw] to a file (2000)
Some ThankYou page problems (1997)