Re: sandbox is hogging 99% cpu cycles

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2004


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 58399
interpreted = N
texte = I'm pretty sure 6.0a contains the bug still and possibly 6.0 product may as well, or at-least I helped trouble shoot a server which I believe was running 6.0 and exhibiting the same problem just a week or two ago. On Jun 14, 2004, at 6:58 PM, Jim Lanford wrote: > Server #1 had 5.1e and was upgraded to 6.0a > last sunday. So perhaps upgraded machines carry the bug forward. > Anyway, on the 6.0a box I was running top when I clicked triggers and > emailer > and I watched the cycles drop. > > Just a guess, but yes it was WebDNA 6.0a RHES 3.x (latest patches) > (I waited for a version beyond 6.0 before upgrading) -- Jesse Williams-Proudman Blue Box Development :: Custom Web Solutions +1.206.778.8777 :: jesse@blueboxdev.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: sandbox is hogging 99% cpu cycles ( Jesse Proudman 2004)
  2. Re: sandbox is hogging 99% cpu cycles ( Jim Lanford 2004)
  3. Re: sandbox is hogging 99% cpu cycles ( Stuart Tremain 2004)
  4. Re: sandbox is hogging 99% cpu cycles ( Jim Lanford 2004)
  5. Re: sandbox is hogging 99% cpu cycles ( Stuart Tremain 2004)
  6. Re: sandbox is hogging 99% cpu cycles ( Jesse Proudman 2004)
  7. sandbox is hogging 99% cpu cycles ( Jim Lanford 2004)
I'm pretty sure 6.0a contains the bug still and possibly 6.0 product may as well, or at-least I helped trouble shoot a server which I believe was running 6.0 and exhibiting the same problem just a week or two ago. On Jun 14, 2004, at 6:58 PM, Jim Lanford wrote: > Server #1 had 5.1e and was upgraded to 6.0a > last sunday. So perhaps upgraded machines carry the bug forward. > Anyway, on the 6.0a box I was running top when I clicked triggers and > emailer > and I watched the cycles drop. > > Just a guess, but yes it was WebDNA 6.0a RHES 3.x (latest patches) > (I waited for a version beyond 6.0 before upgrading) -- Jesse Williams-Proudman Blue Box Development :: Custom Web Solutions +1.206.778.8777 :: jesse@blueboxdev.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Jesse Proudman

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[input] [/input] (1997) RE: Answer: WebDelivery downloads alias, not original ? (1997) Expected Behavior? (1999) Nested tags count question (1997) Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997) RE: protect tag on NT (1997) Re2: AAgghh!! Help, please. SSL strikes again. (1997) label?! (2005) Secure Server (1997) did I miss anything (1997) WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997) Using the new syntax/scoping methods (2000) [WebDNA] WebDNA & VPS (2009) problems with WebCat-Plugin () Dates (1996) question: Eudora 3.1.1 (1997) [Webcat 2]Next (1997) WebCat2_Mac RETURNs in .db (1997) WebCatalog dying in WebTen Revisited (1998) Pithy questions on webcommerce & siteedit (1997)