Re: Bad Cookie / Internet Option / Internet Explorer
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2004
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 60566
interpreted = N
texte = Donovan Brooke wrote: > Works right? Yup. > > Only difference is this is a GET (URL) method. Except it also doesn't have all of the multiple redirects before the final page, too, which I think is a more likely source of difficulties > > I just now decided to add your MIMEHeaders.inc file. but I'm not sure if > that is > approaching the problem. Its almost like the page is expiring before it > is being hit. Expires as it is hit, yes. > > If I remember right, W3C states that POST method was initially designed > for the purpose of sending form input that is not supposed to be > retrievable after being > sent (however most browsers let you do a "refresh" to get the content > back). So, > maybe I'll try setting the expires into the future? Yes, give it a short expires to see if that works (5 seconds?). John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Donovan Brooke wrote: > Works right? Yup. > > Only difference is this is a GET (URL) method. Except it also doesn't have all of the multiple redirects before the final page, too, which I think is a more likely source of difficulties > > I just now decided to add your MIMEHeaders.inc file. but I'm not sure if > that is > approaching the problem. Its almost like the page is expiring before it > is being hit. Expires as it is hit, yes. > > If I remember right, W3C states that POST method was initially designed > for the purpose of sending form input that is not supposed to be > retrievable after being > sent (however most browsers let you do a "refresh" to get the content > back). So, > maybe I'll try setting the expires into the future? Yes, give it a short expires to see if that works (5 seconds?). John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
John Peacock
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Emailer and encryption (1997)
searching illegal HTML (2002)
strange IE 4.0 (1998)
Re:quit command on NT (1997)
Add sizes from check boxes (2002)
total number of matches (1999)
nesting limits? (1998)
Problem with Setheader (2001)
RE: 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
Webcat2, WebCommerce, Mod 10 etc. (1997)
Re1000001: Setting up shop (1997)
Merchant and WebCat 3.0 (1998)
Email Format (Umlaut) (2004)
redirect within the ErrorMessages.db (2003)
select multiple (1997)
using showpage and showcart commands (1996)
Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997)
More Applescript (1997)
Keep away (1997)
Mac v. NT (1998)