Re: [urgent] Phone number at SM

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2006


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 66334
interpreted = N
texte = Donnovan, Did you read the link you sent me? In the middle of that page, it clearly states "RedHat Enterprise": RedHat 8.x, 9.x & Enterprise - RPM for WebDNA 6.0. It doesn't say "Red Hat Enterprise ES 3", it just says Enterprise. Every other vendor I've ever worked with that has claimed support for Red Hat "Enterprise" means it runs across all Enterprise versions. I've also worked with a few vendors who only supported certain ES versions and they _clearly_ label their OS support for those specific version. And it's not that WebDNA doesn't run. It _does_ run. The problem is with the [math time] and [format seconds_to_time] tags as I've posted about for the last 24 hours. As there is no Post-Install tag checking script to make sure everything is operating correctly, there was no way to know this was broken until sites were moved to the box. I shouldn't have to feel "Lucky" that a company I've paid thousands of dollars to is fixing what I bought when it doesn't work on a platform they've labeled it should on their website. On Feb 28, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >> Except when basic tags don't operate properly and there is no >> documentation that it doesn't run on a modern OS... > > So you are then sure it doesn't run on that OS? > > I dunno, I would like it to run on all OS's as well... but I guess > I would make sure an app is checked out on an OS before installing > it to host live or important content. > > There is this reference: > http://webdna.smithmicro.com/default.tpl? > PageID=49&PageName=Installers&ParentID=50 > (also see "updates/patches") > > Though it may not be an ideal sign of what is supported, it *would* > be cause for a phone call or email (prior to installation) if your > OS is not > on those lists. > > IMO, I'd feel lucky and served that SMSI is taking care of this unique > situation when they have not (apparently) claimed support for that OS. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [urgent] Phone number at SM ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  2. Re: [urgent] Phone number at SM ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  3. Re: [urgent] Phone number at SM ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  4. Re: [urgent] Phone number at SM ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  5. Re: [urgent] Phone number at SM ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  6. Re: [urgent] Phone number at SM ( devaulw@onebox.com 2006)
  7. Re: [urgent] Phone number at SM ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  8. Re: [urgent] Phone number at SM ( WJ Starck 2006)
  9. Re: [urgent] Phone number at SM ( "Palle B. Nielsen (PowerPalle)" 2006)
  10. Re: [urgent] Phone number at SM ( "Jeannine W. Stehlin" 2006)
  11. [urgent] Phone number at SM ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
Donnovan, Did you read the link you sent me? In the middle of that page, it clearly states "RedHat Enterprise": RedHat 8.x, 9.x & Enterprise - RPM for WebDNA 6.0. It doesn't say "Red Hat Enterprise ES 3", it just says Enterprise. Every other vendor I've ever worked with that has claimed support for Red Hat "Enterprise" means it runs across all Enterprise versions. I've also worked with a few vendors who only supported certain ES versions and they _clearly_ label their OS support for those specific version. And it's not that WebDNA doesn't run. It _does_ run. The problem is with the [math time] and [format seconds_to_time] tags as I've posted about for the last 24 hours. As there is no Post-Install tag checking script to make sure everything is operating correctly, there was no way to know this was broken until sites were moved to the box. I shouldn't have to feel "Lucky" that a company I've paid thousands of dollars to is fixing what I bought when it doesn't work on a platform they've labeled it should on their website. On Feb 28, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >> Except when basic tags don't operate properly and there is no >> documentation that it doesn't run on a modern OS... > > So you are then sure it doesn't run on that OS? > > I dunno, I would like it to run on all OS's as well... but I guess > I would make sure an app is checked out on an OS before installing > it to host live or important content. > > There is this reference: > http://webdna.smithmicro.com/default.tpl? > PageID=49&PageName=Installers&ParentID=50 > (also see "updates/patches") > > Though it may not be an ideal sign of what is supported, it *would* > be cause for a phone call or email (prior to installation) if your > OS is not > on those lists. > > IMO, I'd feel lucky and served that SMSI is taking care of this unique > situation when they have not (apparently) claimed support for that OS. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Jesse Proudman

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

DataBaseHelper Flawed (1997) WebMerchant and AVS (1998) WebCat cannot handle compatible search parameters? (1997) Can I do this with [grep]? (2002) Multiple SSL Keys (1998) Looking up two prices in database? (1997) ExclusiveLock (2000) Exclude by date - multiple (1997) [WebDNA] Date error (2017) Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997) [OT] MacOs IE5 topmargin and leftmargin bug (2000) Custom WebCat Prefs ... (1997) IIS4b2 and WebCatalog b19 (1997) [WebDNA] Snow Leopard (2009) Surprise x and y post args (1998) Shipcost lookup? (1997) [group] ? (1997) Individual Tax on Items (1998) RE: creating writefile data from a nested search (1997) problem with [include] and Web*/SSL 3.0.1 (1998)