Re: New Server?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2006


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 66350
interpreted = N
texte = My heavily loaded (3-5 megs / sec sustained) Dual 2.8ghz Xeon Dell scored a 267. Less loaded dell box (Approx 1 meg / sec sustained) with a single 2.8 Xeon scored a 275. Dual 3.0ghz Xeon Dell Box with SCSI drives doing about 2 megs / sec sustained scored a 245. Bear in mind these are all running on Red Hat ES 4 which is not a "supported" OS. :) Looks as though the G5s beat the dells mainly in the variable section which is not suprising as that's the code that's not working correctly on the ES 4 boxes. They're clumped together there in the middle of your results page. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: New Server? ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  2. Re: New Server? ( Terry Wilson 2006)
  3. Re: New Server? ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  4. Re: New Server? ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  5. Re: New Server? ( Terry Wilson 2006)
  6. Re: New Server? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  7. Re: New Server? ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  8. Re: New Server? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  9. Re: New Server? ( Phil Herring 2006)
  10. Re: New Server? ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  11. Re: New Server? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  12. Re: New Server? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  13. Re: New Server? ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  14. New Server? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
My heavily loaded (3-5 megs / sec sustained) Dual 2.8ghz Xeon Dell scored a 267. Less loaded dell box (Approx 1 meg / sec sustained) with a single 2.8 Xeon scored a 275. Dual 3.0ghz Xeon Dell Box with SCSI drives doing about 2 megs / sec sustained scored a 245. Bear in mind these are all running on Red Hat ES 4 which is not a "supported" OS. :) Looks as though the G5s beat the dells mainly in the variable section which is not suprising as that's the code that's not working correctly on the ES 4 boxes. They're clumped together there in the middle of your results page. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Jesse Proudman

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

error -43 (1998) WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997) 100% cpu load (2006) Make sure I understand this??? (1997) Cart questions (1997) Emailer Problem (1999) carriage returns in data (1997) price formula (1999) Web Catalog Work/Position (2000) Fw: Would you please check your user who sent the message? (1998) Using Plug-In while running 1.6.1 (1997) Appendfile memory usage (redux) (2003) Summary search -- speed (1997) How is it done? (1998) Progress !! WAS: Trouble with formula.db (1997) RE: [WebDNA] smtp authentication (2008) Problem about [CART] number (1998) target=_blank and form variables (1997) Hiding HTML and breaking the page (1997) WebCat/CyberStudio Compatibility (1998)