Re: Robust WebDNA Job Manager / Accountant
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2006
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 66407
interpreted = N
texte = I think the only way for webDNA to continue to survive and, God forbid, thrive, is if we can open up the best applications to the group. Success for webDNA equals success for us as developers. What will give us all an edge is access to pre-written code. The problem is one of equity. Some of the developers have put a great deal of work into general purpose apps, while many of us have worked on large scale, but very specialized apps. I'm working on something that provides video rehabilitation exercises to chiropractic patients. You can't evenly trade specialized for general purpose unless you're just damn lucky. The challenge is for us to devise some means of compensating those who work on things that benefit us all and webDNA in general. Stuart T. has an absolutely fantastic discussion forum. He's even gone as far as to contact SmithMicro but not received a response. (wow) Perhaps the reward is already built in since the more that the general purpose apps are circulated, the more support work their authors will probably get. Although the better the code, the less of this work there will be. Success for webDNA equals success for us as developers. What will give us all an edge is access to pre-written code On Mar 10, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Dan Strong wrote: >> I was also going to change the version requirements from commerce >> edition to developer addition so that the ISP wouldn't have to >> pony up >> for the more expensive WebDNA version... However, right now it >> requires the cart tags. > > Change from [cart] to [timestamp] (basically write your own cart > numbers). > > Add this somewhere global (pre-parse script, etc.): > [text show=f]timestamp=[math]((([math]{[date]}[/math])-1)*86400)+ > ([math]{[time]}[/math])[/math][/text] > > Then do a global find & replace on the entire app and replace all > instances of "[cart]" with "[timestamp]" > > Would that work for your purposes? > > -Dan > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I think the only way for webDNA to continue to survive and, God forbid, thrive, is if we can open up the best applications to the group. Success for webDNA equals success for us as developers. What will give us all an edge is access to pre-written code. The problem is one of equity. Some of the developers have put a great deal of work into general purpose apps, while many of us have worked on large scale, but very specialized apps. I'm working on something that provides video rehabilitation exercises to chiropractic patients. You can't evenly trade specialized for general purpose unless you're just damn lucky. The challenge is for us to devise some means of compensating those who work on things that benefit us all and webDNA in general. Stuart T. has an absolutely fantastic discussion forum. He's even gone as far as to contact SmithMicro but not received a response. (wow) Perhaps the reward is already built in since the more that the general purpose apps are circulated, the more support work their authors will probably get. Although the better the code, the less of this work there will be. Success for webDNA equals success for us as developers. What will give us all an edge is access to pre-written code On Mar 10, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Dan Strong wrote: >> I was also going to change the version requirements from commerce >> edition to developer addition so that the ISP wouldn't have to >> pony up >> for the more expensive WebDNA version... However, right now it >> requires the cart tags. > > Change from [cart] to [timestamp] (basically write your own cart > numbers). > > Add this somewhere global (pre-parse script, etc.): > [text show=f]timestamp=[math]((([math]{[date]}[/math])-1)*86400)+ > ([math]{[time]}[/math])[/math][/text] > > Then do a global find & replace on the entire app and replace all > instances of "[cart]" with "[timestamp]" > > Would that work for your purposes? > > -Dan > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Pat McCormick
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[WebDNA] Problem with administration (2009)
[WebDNA] naming math vars in v.7 (2010)
calculating tax rates, mail order solutions and version 2 (1997)
Version f1 status (1997)
syntax question, not in online refernce (1997)
Multiple Pulldowns (1997)
intel webdna? (2007)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] (1997)
page chokes on hideif when false and ignored (1998)
remotely add + sign (1997)
[searchString] (1997)
R.I.P. Netscape (2003)
Doesn't change (WebCat 4.0) (2000)
Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)
wierd crashes for multi-sendmails on NT (1997)
OT: Amazon Patents (2000)
WebMerchant and PCAuthorize (1998)
Bad URL reference? (1997)
Anyone using WebCat UNIX on a busy server yet? (1999)
How do I get Google to crawl a WebCat site? (2003)