Running _every_ page through WebCat ?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 10713
interpreted = N
texte = There have been some messages from folks who serve all their pages through WebCat. This certainly isn't what we had originally intended to do, just serve up catalog and ordering type stuff, but the sheer power of WebCat is making it a rather interesting proposition.Before we investigate that possibility in more detail, does anyone have a quantitative estimate of how it would impact overall performance. Even a qualitative estimate would be helpful. We serve up less than 10,000 files per day (with occasional exceptions :-), so we're not a high volume site. However, performance is still an issue as it relates to what the individual visitor sees.Any thoughts ?Thanks, -Sven_____________________________________________________________________ Sven U. Grenander BeeHive Technologies, Inc. http://www.bzzzzzz.com - with a WebCam in Pasadena, California _____________________________________________________________________ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (Sven U. Grenander 1997)
  2. Re: Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  3. Re: Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (Sven U. Grenander 1997)
  4. Re: Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  5. Re: Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (Sven U. Grenander 1997)
  6. Re: Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
  7. Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (Sven U. Grenander 1997)
There have been some messages from folks who serve all their pages through WebCat. This certainly isn't what we had originally intended to do, just serve up catalog and ordering type stuff, but the sheer power of WebCat is making it a rather interesting proposition.Before we investigate that possibility in more detail, does anyone have a quantitative estimate of how it would impact overall performance. Even a qualitative estimate would be helpful. We serve up less than 10,000 files per day (with occasional exceptions :-), so we're not a high volume site. However, performance is still an issue as it relates to what the individual visitor sees.Any thoughts ?Thanks, -Sven_____________________________________________________________________ Sven U. Grenander BeeHive Technologies, Inc. http://www.bzzzzzz.com - with a WebCam in Pasadena, California _____________________________________________________________________ Sven U. Grenander

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Replacing entry (1998) Nested tags count question (1997) Stopping bad HTML propagation ? (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997) Separate SSL Server (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997) Authorize.net questions ... (2003) PIXO support (1997) Sample Tea Room Search Error (1997) Disappearing data (2002) Spiders, robots, whatever you want to call them (1998) unique ascending numbers (2003) [tcpconnect] doing nothing- SM any help here??? (2001) form data submission gets truncated (1997) New commands in Final candidate (1997) More on the email templates (1997) [protect] error page (1997) WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997) [OT] md5 or sha-1 on OSX (2007) sorting by date Y2K mix up (2000)