Re: [WebDNA] Re: shopping sites and the "old commerce tags"

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 108697
interpreted = N
texte = As far as i know, there are already great eCommerce projects built with =WebDNA that do not rely on the old eCommerce tags. For instance Stuart =built a modern and sophisticated one (below) using a lot of modern =javascript (could have gone even further with a drag and drop shopping =cart built with jQuery UI=92s draggable & droppable behaviours) and the =result looks great to me! compare it with our outdated shopping cart =system here (store.webdna.us) and you will understand why i do not want =to stuck with old programs: it kills creativity by keeping designers =into an old an rigid framework.----------------------http://www.top3.com.auAll WebDNA with an amazing backend that manages daily data transfers in =and out, cc processing, and image batching.The data comes across in 4 different files from their POS, an amazingly =complex structure.The product browsing is all built on 3 templates.This was a 9 month project .....RegardsStuart TremainIDFK Web DevelopmentsAUSTRALIAwebdna@idfk.com.au----------------------- chrisOn Feb 25, 2012, at 1:24, Rob wrote:>=20> On Feb 24, 2012, at 7:15 PM, Govinda wrote:>=20>>>>=20>>>> does 7.0 for OSX 32bits -unofficially- include support for old =eCommerce tags?>>=20>>=20>> It would be nice if someone would build a new shopping system that =does not rely on commerce tags... =20>> ...someone who:>>=20>> - currently needs the old commerce tags..=20>> - likes webdna and wants to stick with webdna..=20>> - who does not want to lose (or convert to another language) their =shopping site(s) because webdna eventually might not support legacy =commerce tags 100%... =20>>=20>> I am sure such a system would sell here. Lots of people keep popping =up here, who are in this boat.>>=20>> Probably no one is brave to do it, so far, because it takes alot of =work, and revealing our code to the world invites scrutiny.. and =everyone wants to be seen as doing a good job, or else keep it secret.. =20=>>=20>> BUT:>> - the work has to be done eventually ;-)>> - with just a little CSS, anything can be made to look like anything =(so what is the big risk?) =20>>=20>> A new system just needs to be basic, to start with anyway (enough to =get people to wean off the old commerce tags), .. and keep track of just =(expandable) cart header items.. and cart lineitem items... and simple =checkout. =20>>=20>> I don't have any shopping site projects lately.. and the legacy ones =I do have are already not reliant on commerce tags.. so I don't make =time to do it.. but I am encouraging someone to go for it! (someone who =this topic is current/relevant) =20>>=20>> FWIW>>=20>> -Govinda>>=20>=20> The original sitebuilder and storebuilder both work on 7. Just not the =commerce portion in the back(until today's update).=20>=20> I actually have a lot of this done already, but am a long way from =finishing. To save a lot of time, I just took the original =sitebuilder/storebuilder, and replaced the backend of it, so the =operation is similar to what the original is. The cart was just replaced =with a db that does essentially the same thing, and another db contains =all the other information collected. That allowed me to use all the =original products, related, sections db's etc ... etc..>=20> When I'm done, which won't be for a while, as I have to do it in =between things, I'll throw it out there for anyone that needs it. I just =have to get what I have transitioned over before I can go back to work =on it. With Chris making the legacy tags operational, its going to buy =time for anyone using the old system, until a replacement is written.>=20>=20> Rob>=20>=20>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: [WebDNA] shopping sites and the "old commerce tags" (Rob 2012)

As far as i know, there are already great eCommerce projects built with =WebDNA that do not rely on the old eCommerce tags. For instance Stuart =built a modern and sophisticated one (below) using a lot of modern =javascript (could have gone even further with a drag and drop shopping =cart built with jQuery UI=92s draggable & droppable behaviours) and the =result looks great to me! compare it with our outdated shopping cart =system here (store.webdna.us) and you will understand why i do not want =to stuck with old programs: it kills creativity by keeping designers =into an old an rigid framework.----------------------http://www.top3.com.auAll WebDNA with an amazing backend that manages daily data transfers in =and out, cc processing, and image batching.The data comes across in 4 different files from their POS, an amazingly =complex structure.The product browsing is all built on 3 templates.This was a 9 month project .....RegardsStuart TremainIDFK Web DevelopmentsAUSTRALIAwebdna@idfk.com.au----------------------- chrisOn Feb 25, 2012, at 1:24, Rob wrote:>=20> On Feb 24, 2012, at 7:15 PM, Govinda wrote:>=20>>>>=20>>>> does 7.0 for OSX 32bits -unofficially- include support for old =eCommerce tags?>>=20>>=20>> It would be nice if someone would build a new shopping system that =does not rely on commerce tags... =20>> ...someone who:>>=20>> - currently needs the old commerce tags..=20>> - likes webdna and wants to stick with webdna..=20>> - who does not want to lose (or convert to another language) their =shopping site(s) because webdna eventually might not support legacy =commerce tags 100%... =20>>=20>> I am sure such a system would sell here. Lots of people keep popping =up here, who are in this boat.>>=20>> Probably no one is brave to do it, so far, because it takes alot of =work, and revealing our code to the world invites scrutiny.. and =everyone wants to be seen as doing a good job, or else keep it secret.. =20=>>=20>> BUT:>> - the work has to be done eventually ;-)>> - with just a little CSS, anything can be made to look like anything =(so what is the big risk?) =20>>=20>> A new system just needs to be basic, to start with anyway (enough to =get people to wean off the old commerce tags), .. and keep track of just =(expandable) cart header items.. and cart lineitem items... and simple =checkout. =20>>=20>> I don't have any shopping site projects lately.. and the legacy ones =I do have are already not reliant on commerce tags.. so I don't make =time to do it.. but I am encouraging someone to go for it! (someone who =this topic is current/relevant) =20>>=20>> FWIW>>=20>> -Govinda>>=20>=20> The original sitebuilder and storebuilder both work on 7. Just not the =commerce portion in the back(until today's update).=20>=20> I actually have a lot of this done already, but am a long way from =finishing. To save a lot of time, I just took the original =sitebuilder/storebuilder, and replaced the backend of it, so the =operation is similar to what the original is. The cart was just replaced =with a db that does essentially the same thing, and another db contains =all the other information collected. That allowed me to use all the =original products, related, sections db's etc ... etc..>=20> When I'm done, which won't be for a while, as I have to do it in =between things, I'll throw it out there for anyone that needs it. I just =have to get what I have transitioned over before I can go back to work =on it. With Chris making the legacy tags operational, its going to buy =time for anyone using the old system, until a replacement is written.>=20>=20> Rob>=20>=20>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us christophe.billiottet@webdna.us

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Re: [WebDNA] Re: shopping sites and the "old commerce tags"

2012

Top Articles:

Related Readings: