Re: webcat plugin issue
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2001
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 39856
interpreted = N
texte = no this is not the problem... yesterday, bob and i discovered tpl not being served...while html and htm files were fine...i resolved that issue this morning by copying another plugin from another server running the same version software.----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Uttermohlen
To: WebCatalog Talk Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:33 PM Subject: Re: webcat plugin issue > >only thing changed on the machine was changing from acgi to the plugin. (we > >have change other servers to different versions at remote locations, but the > >one in question has not undergone any change other than the one stated > >above.) > > > > So the problem isn't bannersleuth but that NO webcat code is being > executed on .tpl files, right? > > Try this: > > 1. In webcat prefs change Require tag on Every Page? to Always > interpret WebDna tags on all pages. > > 2. In webcat prefs under allowed template extensions, select > display any template extensions. > > 3. In Webstar admin or admin for whatever server you are using > recheck the mapping of .tpl Make sure the entry for the .tpl > extension does not contain a space after the text .tpl This > sometimes happens. Double check the mapping of the extension to the > correct action. I set up a server once and swore it said Webcat > Plugin. After checking it the fifth time, I realized it said webcat > and the last part was clipped off from viewing. I reselected the > plugin, saved the changes and all was well. You could also change it > to the acgi, save the change, change it back and save that change. > > Hope this helps, > > Paul > > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_ _\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > _/_/_/_/_/ Paul Uttermohlen, Internet Consultant \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/614-323-5146 _\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/__\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-maFrom ???@??? Mon Nov 05 07:24:55 2001 Return-Path: X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 3.4.2 List-Unsubscribe: X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 3.4.2 List-Unsubscribe: Message-ID: Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk) Sender: (WebCatalog Talk) To: (WebCatalog Talk) Precedence: list X-Original-Message-Id: Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 14:00:07 -0800 From: Dale LaFountain Subject: Semi-OT: PanIP patent infringement case MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii ; format=flowedSince most of us run e-commerce websites here, I'm hoping someone else has already seen this:Two days ago we received a letter in the mail (not certified, btw) from a Patent and Trademarks office (attorneys) in San Diego representing PanIP, who is the exclusive licensee of a portfolio of US and Canadian patents that relate to the distribution of information, goods, or services through computerized systems.They claim that our websites infringe on several of their patents relating to a computer search system using both textual and graphical entry paths, and a computerized system that permits an individual to select or order information, goods or services from a data processing installation.How our site does these things differently than the thousands of other websites in the world, I have no idea. The site they sent screenshots of is darkhorse.com, our corporate website that does not even sell directly. Go figure...They are demanding $20k and a signed patent covenant to protect us from future litigation (HA!). Our legal counsel is preparing our response now.My question is: has anyone else seen this or similar demand letter, and if so, what was your response?I find it difficult to believe that we're being singled out as the ONLY alleged infringer on these poorly worded patents that describe the activity of EVERY e-commerce site on the Internet. There are certainly much bigger fish in the Internet ocean than my company. I poked around a few search engines, and could not find any references to this company or the patent infringements.I talked with the product manager at SMSI (since one of the patents involves automated payment processing, SMSI would likely be pulled into this battle if it ever got off the ground), and they haven't heard anything about this either.The PanIP website contains some information on this topic if anyone is interested in reading up before your personalized demand letter arrives. :\ http://www.panip.com/company.htmThanks,Dale -- Dale LaFountain Vice President of Information Technology, WebMaster Dark Horse Comics, Inc. mailto:dalel@darkhorse.com Phone: 503-652-8815 x324 http://www.darkhorse.com/------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
no this is not the problem... yesterday, bob and i discovered tpl not being served...while html and htm files were fine...i resolved that issue this morning by copying another plugin from another server running the same version software.----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Uttermohlen To: WebCatalog Talk Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:33 PM Subject: Re: webcat plugin issue > >only thing changed on the machine was changing from acgi to the plugin. (we > >have change other servers to different versions at remote locations, but the > >one in question has not undergone any change other than the one stated > >above.) > > > > So the problem isn't bannersleuth but that NO webcat code is being > executed on .tpl files, right? > > Try this: > > 1. In webcat prefs change Require tag on Every Page? to Always > interpret WebDna tags on all pages. > > 2. In webcat prefs under allowed template extensions, select > display any template extensions. > > 3. In Webstar admin or admin for whatever server you are using > recheck the mapping of .tpl Make sure the entry for the .tpl > extension does not contain a space after the text .tpl This > sometimes happens. Double check the mapping of the extension to the > correct action. I set up a server once and swore it said Webcat > Plugin. After checking it the fifth time, I realized it said webcat > and the last part was clipped off from viewing. I reselected the > plugin, saved the changes and all was well. You could also change it > to the acgi, save the change, change it back and save that change. > > Hope this helps, > > Paul > > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_ _\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > _/_/_/_/_/ Paul Uttermohlen, Internet Consultant \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/614-323-5146 _\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/__\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-maFrom ???@??? Mon Nov 05 07:24:55 2001 Return-Path: X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 3.4.2 List-Unsubscribe: X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 3.4.2 List-Unsubscribe: Message-ID: Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk) Sender: (WebCatalog Talk) To: (WebCatalog Talk) Precedence: list X-Original-Message-Id: Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 14:00:07 -0800 From: Dale LaFountain Subject: Semi-OT: PanIP patent infringement case MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii ; format=flowedSince most of us run e-commerce websites here, I'm hoping someone else has already seen this:Two days ago we received a letter in the mail (not certified, btw) from a Patent and Trademarks office (attorneys) in San Diego representing PanIP, who is the exclusive licensee of a portfolio of US and Canadian patents that relate to the distribution of information, goods, or services through computerized systems.They claim that our websites infringe on several of their patents relating to a computer search system using both textual and graphical entry paths, and a computerized system that permits an individual to select or order information, goods or services from a data processing installation.How our site does these things differently than the thousands of other websites in the world, I have no idea. The site they sent screenshots of is darkhorse.com, our corporate website that does not even sell directly. Go figure...They are demanding $20k and a signed patent covenant to protect us from future litigation (HA!). Our legal counsel is preparing our response now.My question is: has anyone else seen this or similar demand letter, and if so, what was your response?I find it difficult to believe that we're being singled out as the ONLY alleged infringer on these poorly worded patents that describe the activity of EVERY e-commerce site on the Internet. There are certainly much bigger fish in the Internet ocean than my company. I poked around a few search engines, and could not find any references to this company or the patent infringements.I talked with the product manager at SMSI (since one of the patents involves automated payment processing, SMSI would likely be pulled into this battle if it ever got off the ground), and they haven't heard anything about this either.The PanIP website contains some information on this topic if anyone is interested in reading up before your personalized demand letter arrives. :\ http://www.panip.com/company.htmThanks,Dale -- Dale LaFountain Vice President of Information Technology, WebMaster Dark Horse Comics, Inc. mailto:dalel@darkhorse.com Phone: 503-652-8815 x324 http://www.darkhorse.com/------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Ron Ceballos
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
handling cookies in and out of secure space (2000)
Signal Raised (1997)
Fw: Would you please check your user who sent the message? (1998)
New WebDNA Forum Solution (in development) (2003)
Forum - Test Request (2005)
Calculating multiple shipping... (1997)
Shopping Cart Problem (1998)
return two fields w/ [lookup] (1998)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] (1997)
Couple of techno questions (1999)
[isfile] ? (1997)
redirect tag (2004)
Max Record length restated as maybe bug (1997)
WebSTAR 2.1 freezes my Mac (1997)
founditems (1998)
[/application] error? (1997)
New Webcatalog for Mac (1997)
[WebDNA] What Webcatalog with Itools?? (2008)
all records returned. (1997)
Email notification to one of multiple vendors ? (1997)