Re: [WebDNA] can webdna set the email header (w/[sendmail]) that controls where bounced email goes?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108731
interpreted = N
texte = >> [snip] We want to control where it gets sent, hopefully using = webdna's [sendmail] >> (where we create the original email). Is this possible? >=20 >=20 > Govinda.. not quite sure what you are wanting to do exactly.. but > errors should arrive back to your from account. > Other than that, there is saveonfail/saveonsuccess params for = sendmail.. which would let you find errored emails. > Even PHP uses the =46rom header to set the return-path field on = Windows installs. What we want is that: * when we send an email with [sendmail] that in case it bounces.. that = we get the email back, but to a *different* address than the one we sent = FROM. Sorry=20 I was not super clear about that in my OP. I just looked for old posts on this topic, and I see Tom Duke, and = Chris, saying, = --------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------------- " > Chris, > Hi - it would be great if we could specify the 'return-path' header = using [sendmail]. This is usually overwritten by the MTA and set to = the 'from' header. > =46rom a shell command you can do this using the -f flag. Something = to consider for the future perhaps. > - Tom > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:48 PM, = wrote: > Hi Tom! > exact: the "from:" and "Return-Path:" are set to the same &from=3D = address which is the correct way > On Feb 13, 2012, at 5:14, Tom Duke wrote: > Chris, > Hi - the benefit of being able to specify a 'return-path' header is = that you add parameters to identify the email if it bounces - this can = then be used to set up auto management of bounces. > This is sometimes referred to as VERP = (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_envelope_return_path). > - Tom > Hi Tom! ok, i note this on the to-do list. > - chris " = --------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------------- ...which to me means that Tom expects to NOT be able to do what I want = to do (see the * near the top). Do you concur?, that I cannot use [sendmail] to cause bounced email to = get re-sent to an address *different than* the address I send FROM? Aaron, thanks! We'll write custom text files instead of using = [sendmail] if we have to. First I am just gathering info. Thanks -Govinda= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] can webdna set the email header (w/[sendmail]) that controls where bounced email goes? (Govinda 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] can webdna set the email header (w/[sendmail]) that controls where bounced email goes? (Govinda 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] can webdna set the email header (w/[sendmail]) that controls where bounced email goes? (Govinda 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] can webdna set the email header (w/[sendmail]) that controls where bounced email goes? (aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] can webdna set the email header (w/[sendmail]) that controls where bounced email goes? (aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] can webdna set the email header (w/[sendmail]) that controls where bounced email goes? (Govinda 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] can webdna set the email header (w/[sendmail]) that controls where bounced email goes? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  8. [WebDNA] can webdna set the email header (w/[sendmail]) that controls where bounced email goes? (Govinda 2012)
>> [snip] We want to control where it gets sent, hopefully using = webdna's [sendmail] >> (where we create the original email). Is this possible? >=20 >=20 > Govinda.. not quite sure what you are wanting to do exactly.. but > errors should arrive back to your from account. > Other than that, there is saveonfail/saveonsuccess params for = sendmail.. which would let you find errored emails. > Even PHP uses the =46rom header to set the return-path field on = Windows installs. What we want is that: * when we send an email with [sendmail] that in case it bounces.. that = we get the email back, but to a *different* address than the one we sent = FROM. Sorry=20 I was not super clear about that in my OP. I just looked for old posts on this topic, and I see Tom Duke, and = Chris, saying, = --------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------------- " > Chris, > Hi - it would be great if we could specify the 'return-path' header = using [sendmail]. This is usually overwritten by the MTA and set to = the 'from' header. > =46rom a shell command you can do this using the -f flag. Something = to consider for the future perhaps. > - Tom > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:48 PM, = wrote: > Hi Tom! > exact: the "from:" and "Return-Path:" are set to the same &from=3D = address which is the correct way > On Feb 13, 2012, at 5:14, Tom Duke wrote: > Chris, > Hi - the benefit of being able to specify a 'return-path' header is = that you add parameters to identify the email if it bounces - this can = then be used to set up auto management of bounces. > This is sometimes referred to as VERP = (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_envelope_return_path). > - Tom > Hi Tom! ok, i note this on the to-do list. > - chris " = --------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------------- ...which to me means that Tom expects to NOT be able to do what I want = to do (see the * near the top). Do you concur?, that I cannot use [sendmail] to cause bounced email to = get re-sent to an address *different than* the address I send FROM? Aaron, thanks! We'll write custom text files instead of using = [sendmail] if we have to. First I am just gathering info. Thanks -Govinda= Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Mac Vs WindowsNT (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997) Not really WebCat (1997) New Plug-in and Type 11 errors (1997) Dummy Credit Card Number for debug? (1997) [format 40s]text[/format] doesn't work (1997) Most likely trivial but I'm perplexed (2000) php vs WebCatalog (2000) ooops...WebCatalog [FoundItems] Problem - LONG - (1997) [Fwd: Rotating Banners ... (was LinkExchange)] (1997) [WebDNA] Emailer & SMTP (2009) Credit card types (1997) WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997) Num Sort Descending (OT) (2004) OH CRAP!!!!!- Template not found error!!! (1999) server side includes & webcatalog (2000) GuestBook example (1997) Setting up the server (1997) Date search - yes or no (1997) Integration with SQL (1997)