Re: Code database
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 16252
interpreted = N
texte = At 0:06 Uhr 26.02.1998, Brian B. Burton wrote:>As per my previous post, I am willing (and probably going to start doing) an>online database of code snippets and general hints for webcatalog...>I'm thinking that this site will have fields for:>SKU (have to have some easy way to identify the record)>Date Submitted>Author>Topic or Category>The Code>Min Version of WebCat needed to run this Code>>Am I missing Any fields?I would like to see a searchable textual description of what the code does.>Should this databses be moderated, with someone else testing submitted code>before it is posted to the website? Or will everybody post working code?Moderated should not be necessary since there is still the WebCat mailinglist. And testing - hm - a lot of unpayed work, isn't it?But I wonder how you plan to organize the categories and if any developerwill post his code snippet into the right one...>I don't>want webcatalog to interpret the code on the fly (wouldn't it be ironic if I>had to do this with Filemaker, just to preserve the code?):-)Before you go for a filemaker solution we could help you with a standalone4D database.We are 4D developer and rather new at WebCat but already fascinated. If youlike it we are willing to set up a european mirror of your WebCat site herein vienna.Peter______________Peter OstryVienna/Austriapo@ostry.comwww.ostry.com
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
At 0:06 Uhr 26.02.1998, Brian B. Burton wrote:>As per my previous post, I am willing (and probably going to start doing) an>online database of code snippets and general hints for webcatalog...>I'm thinking that this site will have fields for:>SKU (have to have some easy way to identify the record)>Date Submitted>Author>Topic or Category>The Code>Min Version of WebCat needed to run this Code>>Am I missing Any fields?I would like to see a searchable textual description of what the code does.>Should this databses be moderated, with someone else testing submitted code>before it is posted to the website? Or will everybody post working code?Moderated should not be necessary since there is still the WebCat mailinglist. And testing - hm - a lot of unpayed work, isn't it?But I wonder how you plan to organize the categories and if any developerwill post his code snippet into the right one...>I don't>want webcatalog to interpret the code on the fly (wouldn't it be ironic if I>had to do this with Filemaker, just to preserve the code?):-)Before you go for a filemaker solution we could help you with a standalone4D database.We are 4D developer and rather new at WebCat but already fascinated. If youlike it we are willing to set up a european mirror of your WebCat site herein vienna.Peter______________Peter OstryVienna/Austriapo@ostry.comwww.ostry.com
Peter Ostry
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Dumb Question about Docs (1997)
webcat pro (1998)
Thanks Grant (1997)
RE: [WebDNA] COMMITDATABASE in linux unix 64bits FastCGI version 8.6 (2020)
username's and passwords in uppercase vs lowercase vs mix. (2000)
SiteGuard Use Question (1997)
Summary layout (1997)
practicing safe queries.. (2000)
Weird Linux WebCat Issue (2003)
Error: the 'showcart' command requires that you specify a db (1997)
Data Entry ... Excel Style ... How To? (2001)
Re1000002: Setting up shop (1997)
WebDNA FAQ or FAQs -- was "weird problem" (2004)
Next X hits (1996)
[WebDNA] [WSC] WebDNA Development Summit (2014)
PCS Customer submissions ? (1997)
creating a ShipCosts database (1997)
2cd pare of eyes. (2001)
Rollback capabilities (2002)
[append] problem (1997)