Re: Loss in form
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 19284
interpreted = N
texte = At 02:21 PM 8/3/98, you wrote: >On 8/3/1998 1:32 pm, Kimberly Wyrick so noted... > >>I have a feedback form that allows people to submit other comments, >>however in that textarea, if the person presses return, the information is >>lost. Here's what I have: >> >>Comment Field within Feedback Form: >>
>> >>Here's what I entered: >>This is a test!
>> >>This is a test!! >> >>This is a test, blah, blah, blah.This is a test, blah, blah,blah. >> >>Here's what I get from the [sendmail]: >>Additional Comments: This is a test! >> >> >>Is wrap=virtual part wrong? I've tried it without that, and get the same >>results. Can someone please point me in the right direction? > >Are you doing anything to the comments text in the [sendmail]? I have >the exact same setup (with wrap=virtual), and the sender is pretty much >only: > >[sendmail to=(etc etc etc)] >[comments] >[/sendmail] > >And the carriage returns get passed in the email fine. > My sendmail is the same...unless I'm missing something silly!![sendmail to=Kim@cnetech.com&from=[Email]&Subject=Feedback][Name] submitted feedback, here's what he/she thought: Email: [Email] Operating System: [OS] Browser: [Browser] Overall Rating: [Rate] Navigation: [Ease] Best Part: [Liked] Worst Part: [Disliked] Additional Comments: [Comments] [/sendmail] _________________________ Check out www.cnetech.com !
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
At 02:21 PM 8/3/98, you wrote: >On 8/3/1998 1:32 pm, Kimberly Wyrick so noted... > >>I have a feedback form that allows people to submit other comments, >>however in that textarea, if the person presses return, the information is >>lost. Here's what I have: >> >>Comment Field within Feedback Form: >> >> >>Here's what I entered: >>This is a test! >> >>This is a test!! >> >>This is a test, blah, blah, blah.This is a test, blah, blah,blah. >> >>Here's what I get from the [sendmail]: >>Additional Comments: This is a test! >> >> >>Is wrap=virtual part wrong? I've tried it without that, and get the same >>results. Can someone please point me in the right direction? > >Are you doing anything to the comments text in the [sendmail]? I have >the exact same setup (with wrap=virtual), and the sender is pretty much >only: > >[sendmail to=(etc etc etc)] >[comments] >[/sendmail] > >And the carriage returns get passed in the email fine. > My sendmail is the same...unless I'm missing something silly!![sendmail to=Kim@cnetech.com&from=[Email]&Subject=Feedback][Name] submitted feedback, here's what he/she thought: Email: [Email] Operating System: [OS] Browser: [Browser] Overall Rating: [Rate] Navigation: [Ease] Best Part: [Liked] Worst Part: [Disliked] Additional Comments: [Comments] [/sendmail] _________________________ Check out www.cnetech.com !
Kimberly Wyrick
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Too many database headers? (2003)
randomness (1997)
Dreamweaver plugin (2000)
Problem with [Search] inside of [Loop]? (1997)
PIXO support (1997)
vs (1997)
[OT] See QT? (Was Eaaaasy FTP...) (2003)
[cart] not being interpreted inside [founditems] (1997)
javascript newPopwin and webcat (1998)
WebMerchant Only reads 1.4 order files error (1997)
[format xs] freeze (1997)
QuitFeedback & DBNotOpened errors (1997)
Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (2003)
Blocking off access (2005)
Problems with [Search] param - Mac Plugin b15 (1997)
pc (1997)
[WebDNA] [shell] issue on Mac; file not appearing a PERL exe... (2009)
Referrer field to header field conversion (1997)
no shopping cart (2000)
WebCatalog 2.0 & WebDNA docs in HTML ... (1997)