Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 49055
interpreted = N
texte = Matthew A Perosi wrote: > > You have made a very valid point! Perhaps we need to look at this differently. SMI > does offer a lot of tools, but I only every made 1 web site using StoreBuilder.I used StoreBuilder just as an example for the rank newbie (I've never even used it). I could have easily said the shopping cart contexts as an example of code that does not exist in a mature form in the wild (i.e. free). The [cart] code alone is commonly available in some forms, but I don't know for sure that the number/string being generated is, in fact, unique, like I do for WebDNA.The e-commerce contexts ([orderfile], [addlineitem], [purchase]) hide an enormous amount of backend functionality that only someone who hasn't written code would take for granted. Even the [search] context hides a great deal of sophisticated features, similar to what I have written in Perl (so I am very familiar with the requirements). I can honestly state that, warts and all (i.e. the sometimes odd stacked syntax), the WebDNA [search] context is by far the easiest query language I have ever used.John-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
  2. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  3. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  4. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  5. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  6. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Dale's Stuff 2003)
  7. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Stuart Tremain 2003)
  8. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (marc@kaiwi.com (Marc Kaiwi) 2003)
  9. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  10. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Donovan 2003)
  11. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (John Peacock 2003)
  12. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (andy mowrey 2003)
  13. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  14. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (John Peacock 2003)
  15. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (John Peacock 2003)
  16. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Claude Gelinas 2003)
  17. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (marc@kaiwi.com (Marc Kaiwi) 2003)
  18. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  19. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Matthew A Perosi 2003)
  20. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Matthew A Perosi 2003)
  21. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  22. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (John Peacock 2003)
  23. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (John Peacock 2003)
  24. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Claude Gelinas 2003)
  25. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  26. Re: Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (John Peacock 2003)
  27. Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (Kenneth Grome 2003)
Matthew A Perosi wrote: > > You have made a very valid point! Perhaps we need to look at this differently. SMI > does offer a lot of tools, but I only every made 1 web site using StoreBuilder.I used StoreBuilder just as an example for the rank newbie (I've never even used it). I could have easily said the shopping cart contexts as an example of code that does not exist in a mature form in the wild (i.e. free). The [cart] code alone is commonly available in some forms, but I don't know for sure that the number/string being generated is, in fact, unique, like I do for WebDNA.The e-commerce contexts ([orderfile], [addlineitem], [purchase]) hide an enormous amount of backend functionality that only someone who hasn't written code would take for granted. Even the [search] context hides a great deal of sophisticated features, similar to what I have written in Perl (so I am very familiar with the requirements). I can honestly state that, warts and all (i.e. the sometimes odd stacked syntax), the WebDNA [search] context is by far the easiest query language I have ever used.John-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ John Peacock

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

ANSWER to: CC Merchant suggestions?? (1997) RE: [taxRate] [TaxTotal] ? (1997) Timer Values on [redirect] (1998) sharing cookie recepies (1998) Mozilla/4. and Browser Info.txt (1997) [WebDNA] users.db (2009) WebDNA 4.5 & iTools 7 (2003) Credit card processing - UK (1997) [founditems][replacefounditems] (2003) WebDNA Intranet Edition public demo (2002) [WebDNA] Anyone use this coding style for readability... (2010) migrating from MacOS to unix (2000) [appendfile] ? Or what (2001) Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997) Forms Search Questions (1997) Trouble with formula.db + more explanation (1997) Simple Database close connection (2001) blank pages (2006) [WebDNA] An actual attempt to get WebDNA and MAMP Pro to work - (2018) Problem searching bw & ne of a word (1999)