Re: ReadDateFormat
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 21801
interpreted = N
texte = >After a lot of trials I have discovered that calculation on dates (using >the number of days since 00/00/0000. CF webdna code from Kenneth Grome) >works fine when I drop ReadDateFormat from the preference files of >webcatalog 3. >Everything is wrong when I keep this line in the preference file, no matter >how I set it (Month/Day/Year or Day/Month/Year) et how I set the Date >Format in the clock (American Format or French Format). > >I can't see what I am doing wrong. Any hint? and is it mandatory to have >the ReadFormat defined in the preference file?I developed my date code on webcat 2.x, before the ReadDateFormat preference ever existed. From what you're saying, it seems that if you simply remove this preference from the WebCatalog Prefs file, webcat 3.x defaults to some internal code that still allows my external webdna code to work properly.Therefore, it appears that there is some common internal date code in both 2.x and 3.x, but that code cannot be used in 3.x *unless* you remove the ReadDateFormat preference. If you leave it in, webcat uses the new internal code, and that new code may have a bug in it that prevents my date stuff from working properly.PCS will surely have more information about this theory ...Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>After a lot of trials I have discovered that calculation on dates (using >the number of days since 00/00/0000. CF webdna code from Kenneth Grome) >works fine when I drop ReadDateFormat from the preference files of >webcatalog 3. >Everything is wrong when I keep this line in the preference file, no matter >how I set it (Month/Day/Year or Day/Month/Year) et how I set the Date >Format in the clock (American Format or French Format). > >I can't see what I am doing wrong. Any hint? and is it mandatory to have >the ReadFormat defined in the preference file?I developed my date code on webcat 2.x, before the ReadDateFormat preference ever existed. From what you're saying, it seems that if you simply remove this preference from the WebCatalog Prefs file, webcat 3.x defaults to some internal code that still allows my external webdna code to work properly.Therefore, it appears that there is some common internal date code in both 2.x and 3.x, but that code cannot be used in 3.x *unless* you remove the ReadDateFormat preference. If you leave it in, webcat uses the new internal code, and that new code may have a bug in it that prevents my date stuff from working properly.PCS will surely have more information about this theory ...Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Search in 2 or more catalogs (1997)
2.0Beta Command Ref (can't find this instruction) (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [shownext method=post] ??? (1997)
Odd error in logs (1998)
Shopping with Accounts (2003)
WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997)
WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997)
Searching for words equal to A or equal to B (1999)
[WebDNA] Store module/site (2012)
WebCat2final1 crashes (1997)
Ampersand is breaking search context (1999)
Great product and great job ! (1997)
Multi Actions (1999)
Internet Explorer and caching (2000)
OT: 800x600 (2003)
re:check boxes (1997)
emailer (1997)
too many nested [xxx] (1997)
Re:Help name our technology! (1997)
Selling WebDNA as a solution (2003)